Re: [PATCH/RFC] msleep() with hrtimers

Roman Zippel
2007-07-16T14:31:53Z

Hi,

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> because when i assumed the obvious, you called it an
> insult so please dont leave any room for assumptions and remove any
> ambiguity - especially as our communication seems to be marred by what
> appears to be frequent misunderstandings ;-)

What the hell is this supposed to be? How am I not to take this:

"i did not want to embarrass you (and distract the discussion) with
answering a pretty stupid, irrelevant question"

as an insult? How does it reflect on someone if he asks "stupid,
irrelevant questions"? If it had been a misunderstanding, you could have
ask appropriately instead of assuming I'm an idiot.
BTW Adding smileys to it doesn't make it any funnier, since it I don't
believe in the "misunderstandings" theory anymore. :-(

bye, Roman