From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:55:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:55:03 -0400 Received: from roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com ([24.169.102.121]:7370 "EHLO roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:54:49 -0400 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:55:00 -0400 From: Chris Mason To: Wolly , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Huge disk performance degradation STILL IN 2.4.10 Message-ID: <2100580000.1001289300@tiny> In-Reply-To: <200109232319.BAA02449@enigma.deepspace.net> In-Reply-To: <200109211723.TAA00638@enigma.deepspace.net> <200109232319.BAA02449@enigma.deepspace.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, September 24, 2001 01:19:18 AM +0200 Wolly wrote: > Hi kernel hackers, > > As soon as 2.4.10 was out, I got the patch and tested it again. > The problem is still there and did not get better at all. > Could you please mount the FS with -o notail and try again? I think your test is hitting a worst case in the 2.4.x reiserfs tail code. -chris