From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Possible use of RCU while in extended QS: idle vs RCU read-side in interrupt vs rcu_eqs_exit
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 20:38:51 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2103471967.794.1547084331086.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
Hi Paul,
I've had a user report that trace_sched_waking() appears to be
invoked while !rcu_is_watching() in some situation, so I started
digging into the scheduler idle code.
It appears that interrupts are re-enabled before rcu_eqs_exit() is
invoked when exiting idle code from the scheduler.
I wonder what happens if an interrupt handler (including scheduler code)
happens to issue a RCU read-side critical section before rcu_eqs_exit()
is called ? Is there some code on interrupt entry that ensures rcu eqs
state is exited in such scenario ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-10 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-10 1:38 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2019-01-10 4:13 ` Possible use of RCU while in extended QS: idle vs RCU read-side in interrupt vs rcu_eqs_exit Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 6:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-01-10 14:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 16:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-10 16:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-01-10 17:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-01-10 17:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-10 17:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-01-10 17:45 ` Perf: event wakeup discards sched_waking events Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-01-14 13:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-14 21:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-01-14 22:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-01-14 22:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2103471967.794.1547084331086.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox