From: "Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@lycos.com>
To: rjw@sisk.pl
Cc: tino.keitel@tikei.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [REGRESSION] [Linux 3.2] top/htop and all other CPU usage metering applications has gone crackers
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:57:12 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2103936926.165868.1322395032341.JavaMail.mail@webmail17> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 201111271245.57772.rjw@sisk.pl
> On Nov 27, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, November 27, 2011, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 21:05:53 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:30:15 +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to report a weird regression in Linux 3.2 (running rc3 now) - all CPU metering applications have gone terribly mad
> > > > under this kernel:
> > >
> > > I get the same using top, htop and the gnome system monitor with kernel
> > > 3.2 on a Sandy Bridge quad core box, running Debian unstable.
> >
> > I just tested 3.2-rc2, and see the same bug.
>
> I'm seeing that too on one of my test boxes, but not all the time
> (i.e. there are periods in which the readings are correct). The other boxes
> I've tested with 3.2-rc are fine in that respect.
>
> Also, it seems that it shows 100%-(real load) when it is wrong. So, it looks
> like there's an overflow somewhere in the CPU load measuring code, at least
> on some CPUs.
>
> What's your CPU, BTW?
Intel Core i5 2500, i686
Best wishes,
Artem
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-27 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-24 10:30 [REGRESSION] [Linux 3.2] top/htop and all other CPU usage metering applications has gone crackers Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-11-24 20:05 ` Tino Keitel
2011-11-27 11:04 ` Tino Keitel
2011-11-27 11:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-27 11:45 ` Tino Keitel
2011-11-27 11:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-27 11:57 ` Artem S. Tashkinov [this message]
2011-11-28 19:55 ` Tino Keitel
2011-11-28 20:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-28 21:41 ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-28 21:43 ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-28 21:48 ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-29 8:14 ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-29 21:25 ` Tino Keitel
2011-11-29 21:16 ` Maciej Rutecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2103936926.165868.1322395032341.JavaMail.mail@webmail17 \
--to=t.artem@lycos.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tino.keitel@tikei.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox