From: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
To: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: dev->of_node overwrite can cause device loading with different driver
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:49:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21049.26895.978512.36292@ipc1.ka-ro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130918083155.GB10126@pengutronix.de>
Hi,
Markus Pargmann writes:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 01:28:09PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 05:17:29AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 09:16:53AM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> > > > 3. We could fix up all drivers that change the of_node. But there are
> > > > ARM DT frameworks that require a device struct as parameter instead
> > > > of a device_node parameter (e.g. soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm). So a
> > > > driver core, initialized by a glue driver with DT bindings, has to
> > > > set dev->of_node to use those frameworks. I think it is strange to
> > > > have such DT framework interfaces if a driver is not supposed to
> > > > overwrite dev->of_node permanently.
> > >
> > > How about any driver that does muck with this structure, restore it
> > > properly if their probe() function fails? Yes, you show that this is
> > > going to be tricky in some places (i.e. musb), but it makes sense that
> > > the burden of fixing this issue would rest on them, as they are the ones
> > > causing this problem, right?
> >
> > It's not about overwriting at all.
>
> musb does not overwrite of_node, but other drivers do, e.g. USB chipidea
> core driver which uses its parent of_node. When probe fails in this
> case, we could end up with similar issues.
>
This has already been fixed in commit:
e98b44e9 usb: chipidea: prevent endless loop registering platform_devices when probe fails
in linux-next
Lothar Waßmann
--
___________________________________________________________
Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996
www.karo-electronics.de | info@karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-18 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-13 15:53 dev->of_node overwrite can cause device loading with different driver Markus Pargmann
2013-09-13 17:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-09-14 7:16 ` Markus Pargmann
2013-09-14 11:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-18 8:43 ` Markus Pargmann
2013-09-14 12:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-09-14 12:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-18 8:31 ` Markus Pargmann
2013-09-18 8:49 ` Lothar Waßmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21049.26895.978512.36292@ipc1.ka-ro \
--to=lw@karo-electronics.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mpa@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox