From: Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] reduce IPI noise due to /dev/cdrom open/close
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 15:32:19 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21169.1151991139@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "03 Jul 2006 11:33:54 -0400." <yq0mzbqhfdp.fsf@jaguar.mkp.net>
Jes Sorensen (on 03 Jul 2006 11:33:54 -0400) wrote:
>Anyway, this patch reduces the IPI noise by keeping a cpumask of CPUs
>which have items in the bh lru and only flushing on the relevant
>CPUs. On systems with larger CPU counts it's quite normal that only a
>few CPUs are actively doing block IO, so spewing IPIs everywhere to
>flush this is unnecessary.
>
>Index: linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
>===================================================================
>--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/buffer.c
>+++ linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
>@@ -1323,6 +1323,7 @@ struct bh_lru {
> };
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bh_lru, bh_lrus) = {{ NULL }};
>+static cpumask_t lru_in_use;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> #define bh_lru_lock() local_irq_disable()
>@@ -1352,9 +1353,14 @@ static void bh_lru_install(struct buffer
> lru = &__get_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
> if (lru->bhs[0] != bh) {
> struct buffer_head *bhs[BH_LRU_SIZE];
>- int in;
>- int out = 0;
>+ int in, out, cpu;
>
>+ cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
Why raw_smp_processor_id? That normally indicates code that wants a
lazy cpu number, but this code requires the exact cpu number, IMHO
using raw_smp_processor_id is confusing. smp_processor_id can safely
be used here, bh_lru_lock has disabled irq or preempt.
>+ /* Test first to avoid cache lines bouncing around */
>+ if (!cpu_isset(cpu, lru_in_use))
>+ cpu_set(cpu, lru_in_use);
>+
>+ out = 0;
> get_bh(bh);
> bhs[out++] = bh;
> for (in = 0; in < BH_LRU_SIZE; in++) {
>@@ -1500,19 +1506,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread);
> */
> static void invalidate_bh_lru(void *arg)
> {
>- struct bh_lru *b = &get_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
>+ struct bh_lru *b;
> int i;
>
>+ local_irq_disable();
>+ b = &get_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
> for (i = 0; i < BH_LRU_SIZE; i++) {
> brelse(b->bhs[i]);
> b->bhs[i] = NULL;
> }
> put_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
>+ local_irq_enable();
> }
>
> static void invalidate_bh_lrus(void)
> {
>- on_each_cpu(invalidate_bh_lru, NULL, 1, 1);
>+ /*
>+ * Need to hand down a copy of the mask or we wouldn't be run
>+ * anywhere due to the original mask being cleared
>+ */
>+ cpumask_t mask = lru_in_use;
>+ cpus_clear(lru_in_use);
>+ schedule_on_each_cpu_mask(invalidate_bh_lru, NULL, mask);
> }
Racy? Start with an empty lru_in_use.
Cpu A Cpu B
invalidate_bh_lrus()
mask = lru_in_use;
preempted
block I/O
bh_lru_install()
cpu_set(cpu, lru_in_use);
resume
cpus_clear(lru_in_use);
schedule_on_each_cpu_mask() - does not send IPI to cpu B
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-04 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-03 15:33 [patch] reduce IPI noise due to /dev/cdrom open/close Jes Sorensen
2006-07-03 15:37 ` [PATCH] simplfy bh_lru_install Milton Miller
2006-07-03 15:37 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-03 15:37 ` [patch] reduce IPI noise due to /dev/cdrom open/close Milton Miller
2006-07-04 7:47 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 7:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-04 8:12 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 8:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-04 8:33 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 13:02 ` Helge Hafting
2006-07-04 8:42 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-04 8:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 9:30 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-04 5:32 ` Keith Owens [this message]
2006-07-04 6:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-04 7:51 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 9:13 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-04 17:33 ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-05 7:30 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-05 18:26 ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-05 0:10 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-07-04 7:49 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 8:04 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21169.1151991139@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=kaos@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox