From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 21:12:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 21:12:46 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:10512 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 21:12:39 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: "Dunlap, Randy" cc: "'Jeff Garzik'" , "'Kernel Mailing List'" Subject: Re: test10-pre7 (LINK ordering) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:24:24 -0800." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 13:11:30 +1100 Message-ID: <21184.973044690@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:24:24 -0800, "Dunlap, Randy" wrote: >Is it valid to run depmod like this before >booting the kernel that has usbcore in-kernel? >depmod -ae works after I boot that kernel + usbcore. To run depmod against a new 2.4.0-test10 kernel, make modules_install depmod -ae -F System.map 2.4.0-test10 Without -F, depmod reads /proc/ksyms which are for the old kernel. make modules_install runs depmod with those parameters anyway. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/