From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: Remove unnecessary ret variable in rtw_drv_init()
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 12:15:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2121129.EM0CHCvl88@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210816090500.GG1931@kadam>
On Monday, August 16, 2021 11:05:00 AM CEST Dan Carpenter wrote:
> To be honest, I prefered the original.
>
> foo = alloc();
> if (!foo) {
> ret = -EWHATEVER;
> goto free_last_thing;
> }
>
> I like this style of error handling because all the information is
> there. You don't need to scroll down.
>
Thinking deeper about this style of error handling, I find that Dan is quite
right in preferring readability over removal of (technically unnecessary)
temporary variables. Perhaps the trade-off between brevity and readability
should (in general) favor the latter.
Furthermore, those temporary variables make the code easily adaptable/
extensible in cases where, in future revisions of the code, there will be more
different errors to handle.
However, it's mainly a matter of style, so...
>
> I don't really care about this specific patch at all. It's a small
> thing. But we had someone come through who was sort of obsessed with
> removing these sorts of variables. Just because you can remove a
> variable doesn't necessarily make the code more readable.
>
> If you're doing the work and maintaining the driver you get to choose
> your own style to some extent.
>
I agree: choose your own style (to some extent).
Thanks,
Fabio
>
> But I don't want to encourage people to
> start sending these sort of patches more generally.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-16 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-13 20:14 [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: Remove unnecessary ret variable in rtw_drv_init() Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-13 21:55 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-08-14 17:16 ` Phillip Potter
2021-08-16 9:05 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-08-16 10:15 ` Fabio M. De Francesco [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2121129.EM0CHCvl88@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox