Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: scpi: add thermal dependency

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>]

On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 6:09:54 AM CET Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 13-03-18, 12:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > A built-in scpi cpufreq driver cannot link against a modular
> > thermal framework:
> > 
> > drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_ready':
> > scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x4c): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register'
> > drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_exit':
> > scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x9c): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_unregister'
> > 
> > This adds a Kconfig dependency that makes sure this configuration
> > is not possible, while allowing all configurations that can work.
> > Note that disabling CPU_THERMAL means we don't care about the
> > THERMAL dependency.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> > index 9bbb5b39d18a..d9457d1e535c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ config ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ
> >  config ARM_SCPI_CPUFREQ
> >  	tristate "SCPI based CPUfreq driver"
> >  	depends on ARM_SCPI_PROTOCOL && COMMON_CLK_SCPI
> > +	depends on !CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL
> >  	help
> >  	  This adds the CPUfreq driver support for ARM platforms using SCPI
> >  	  protocol for CPU power management.
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Applied, thanks!