From: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:46:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21250cdb-e398-448c-be08-e9b3778b3771@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206215659.3350066-8-superm1@kernel.org>
On 2/7/2025 3:26 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>
> Bitfield masks are easier to follow and less error prone.
Looks good to me, just one suggestion below, apart from that,
Reviewed-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 18 +++++++++---------
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 16 ++++++----------
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 3eadc4d5de837..f77335ebae981 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -700,15 +700,15 @@
> #define MSR_AMD_CPPC_REQ 0xc00102b3
> #define MSR_AMD_CPPC_STATUS 0xc00102b4
>
> -#define AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(x) (((x) >> 0) & 0xff)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(x) (((x) >> 8) & 0xff)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(x) (((x) >> 16) & 0xff)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(x) (((x) >> 24) & 0xff)
> -
> -#define AMD_CPPC_MAX_PERF(x) (((x) & 0xff) << 0)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_MIN_PERF(x) (((x) & 0xff) << 8)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_DES_PERF(x) (((x) & 0xff) << 16)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_ENERGY_PERF_PREF(x) (((x) & 0xff) << 24)
> +#define AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
How about AMD_CPPC_"CAP"_LOWEST_PERF_MASK and
> +#define AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> +#define AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
> +#define AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
> +
> +#define AMD_CPPC_MAX_PERF_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
AMD_CPPC_"REQ"_MAX_PERF_MASK, just to indicate these fields
belong to which register? But we can keep it as is, if you think it
would be a mouthful, I'll leave it upto you.
Thanks,
Dhananjay
> +#define AMD_CPPC_MIN_PERF_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> +#define AMD_CPPC_DES_PERF_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
> +#define AMD_CPPC_EPP_PERF_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
>
> /* AMD Performance Counter Global Status and Control MSRs */
> #define MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS 0xc0000300
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
> index d745dd586303c..d68a4cb0168fa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ int amd_get_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu, u32 *highest_perf)
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> - val = AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(val);
> + val = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_MASK, val);
> } else {
> ret = cppc_get_highest_perf(cpu, &val);
> if (ret)
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> index adaa62fb2b04e..2595faa492bf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> @@ -158,10 +158,10 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
> return;
> }
>
> - highest_perf = AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1);
> - nominal_perf = AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(cap1);
> - lowest_nonlinear_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(cap1);
> - lowest_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1);
> + highest_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + nominal_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + lowest_nonlinear_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + lowest_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> }
>
> if (highest_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->perf.highest_perf) &&
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 71636bd9884c8..cd96443fc117f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -89,11 +89,6 @@ static bool cppc_enabled;
> static bool amd_pstate_prefcore = true;
> static struct quirk_entry *quirks;
>
> -#define AMD_CPPC_MAX_PERF_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_MIN_PERF_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_DES_PERF_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_EPP_PERF_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
> -
> /*
> * AMD Energy Preference Performance (EPP)
> * The EPP is used in the CCLK DPM controller to drive
> @@ -445,12 +440,13 @@ static int msr_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>
> perf.highest_perf = numerator;
> perf.max_limit_perf = numerator;
> - perf.min_limit_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1);
> - perf.nominal_perf = AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(cap1);
> - perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(cap1);
> - perf.lowest_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1);
> + perf.min_limit_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + perf.nominal_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + perf.lowest_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->perf, perf);
> - WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1));
> + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_MASK, cap1));
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 21:56 [PATCH 00/14] amd-pstate cleanups Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 01/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Show a warning when a CPU fails to setup Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 11:59 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-10 13:50 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-10 15:13 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 02/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop min and max cached frequencies Mario Limonciello
2025-02-07 10:44 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-07 16:15 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 03/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move perf values into a union Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 13:38 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 22:14 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12 6:31 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-12 22:03 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 04/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Overhaul locking Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 5:02 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 21:54 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12 5:15 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-12 22:05 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 05/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop `cppc_cap1_cached` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 5:46 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 06/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Use _free macro to free put policy Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 5:58 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 6:16 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar [this message]
2025-02-11 18:31 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 08/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache CPPC request in shared mem case too Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 9:18 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 09/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move all EPP tracing into *_update_perf and *_set_epp functions Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12 6:39 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 10/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Update cppc_req_cached for shared mem EPP writes Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:01 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 11/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop debug statements for policy setting Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:03 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 12/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache a pointer to policy in cpudata Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:13 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 19:17 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12 3:52 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 13/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Rework CPPC enabling Mario Limonciello
2025-02-13 4:42 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 14/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Stop caching EPP Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:27 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21250cdb-e398-448c-be08-e9b3778b3771@amd.com \
--to=dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=superm1@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox