From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-y-209.mailbox.org (mout-y-209.mailbox.org [91.198.250.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B012E859; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.198.250.237 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723812383; cv=none; b=KwFUwPdmE8e45mR0YopcgtwVcHqmks4GZLAzYAcc5ymKTgdEIdYuRV/91zZEpL3BCNqlc8ludEcnEr/IO+W1QTFnW3gLsyJ4+TLhFCtuxplidUrj0HGyN5AU+WwuAVvu0nVID7qUJ16cTWzs0CBK5HO+acxNjr47ejvbfHQy7dI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723812383; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QWNpYU3pWiV57+7SurtAARnts5tJewlmVTfYZF98uvI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KKLHV2kwGMZSONwzkXFlA24mRU8VL6xvQhnE7Y5hLiVADUtql9i+Nn+ieQyjN3OiXlHhQd6Zd+VuGlLVhhOuCn6ydNm5W1WW+QHaU1dIZNJ9qPazhwbA4wwruSzZPQGz4GB4gAv3ExYyTkh7iO+a9iWJjWmTRDgT0cLpq4f2RrM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=woltmann.art; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=woltmann.art; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=woltmann.art header.i=@woltmann.art header.b=Ofo4kXtN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.198.250.237 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=woltmann.art Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=woltmann.art Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=woltmann.art header.i=@woltmann.art header.b="Ofo4kXtN" Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [10.196.197.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-y-209.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WlhZ10TJ1z9vl7; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:46:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=woltmann.art; s=MBO0001; t=1723812377; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EkqdX+9+e8U5naCUvH0638tTZBSM4TEqE32jNdQOARc=; b=Ofo4kXtNA1ZfrC9lipkdlD0FwPHu2uVn6vFRW4RhTGHkEYaAsoWkDIz/8V1fadv3BOKbeA jxQXvXTla3NLJpcwhMOqrZhQLObBwUrA2XqMFfR1QCYJBrEQ3ayCojcQW2sv2yWajjci3m /Zb9aTHODEUXzN2QZqPfELo1LLGpCgMs9laVNDtAgwPclog7K4oDdMea0/BmBGCShb3JsB UVgMisUuYf/au75ldDyRmJNahSn0/etX6lvbAlm1toibQJLIRgvMGLZqxie7xTGZa7j5ZC 8KdN20TbKU86qDJflia+b2BUnl6XPyBgA0otoAgb/bxF/aqcYWChWpi1VvjmFw== Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:46:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Woltmann To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Wedson Almeida Filho , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Alice Ryhl , Jonathan Corbet , Julian Merkle , Wei Liu , Sven Van Asbroeck , Adam Bratschi-Kaye , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , open list Message-ID: <2130133683.467462.1723812373582@office.mailbox.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240816092536.2444105-1-vincent@woltmann.art> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: Remove erronous blockquote in coding guidelines Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal > Miguel Ojeda hat am 16.08.2024 11:32 CE= ST geschrieben: >=20 > =20 > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:26=E2=80=AFAM Vincent Woltmann wrote: > > > > - While sometimes the reason might look trivial and therefore unneed= ed, > > - writing these comments is not just a good way of documenting what = has been > > - taken into account, but most importantly, it provides a way to kno= w that > > - there are no *extra* implicit constraints. > > +While sometimes the reason might look trivial and therefore unneeded, > > +writing these comments is not just a good way of documenting what has = been > > +taken into account, but most importantly, it provides a way to know th= at > > +there are no *extra* implicit constraints. >=20 > Doesn't this part of the change make the paragraph be outside its bullet? Yes, you are quite right, I must have missed that. Thank you for the feedba= ck and I will prepare a new patch Have a great day, Vincent