From: caiqian@redhat.com
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #17341] kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:15:55 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2140525299.1437291285028155909.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457818084.1437271285028093752.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
It had been fixed by Tejun already.
commit 477a3c33d1efa0342a74bd02da2e049191993e2c
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue Aug 31 10:54:35 2010 +0200
workqueue: fix GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED initialization
init_workqueues() incorrectly marks workqueues for all possible CPUs
associated. Combined with mayday_mask initialization bug, this can
make rescuers keep trying to bind to an offline gcwq indefinitely.
Fix init_workqueues() such that only online CPUs have their gcwqs have
GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED cleared.
----- "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary
> report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17341
> Subject : kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
> Submitter : CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
> Date : 2010-08-27 12:35 (25 days old)
> Message-ID :
> <2136707099.1405541282912500148.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128291252612135&w=2
> Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
next parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-21 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1457818084.1437271285028093752.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-09-21 0:15 ` caiqian [this message]
2010-09-21 0:19 ` [Bug #17341] kdump regression compared to v2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 18:47 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-20 19:08 ` [Bug #17341] kdump regression compared to v2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-12 18:11 2.6.36-rc3-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-12 18:14 ` [Bug #17341] kdump regression compared to v2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 22:24 2.6.36-rc3: Reported regressions from 2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-29 22:36 ` [Bug #17341] kdump regression compared to v2.6.35 Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2140525299.1437291285028155909.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com \
--to=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox