From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933813AbXJOUpz (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:45:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764013AbXJOUpU (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:45:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:53241 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762552AbXJOUpS (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:45:18 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <21428.1192267071@redhat.com> To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] frv: Remove duplicate output of .exit.data X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; nmh 1.2-20070115cvs; GNU Emacs 22.1.50 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:43:04 +0100 Message-ID: <21474.1192480984@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Fair enough -- a quick test shows you are right. Wouldn't it deserve a > comment, though? I know hardly anybody dares looking into these scripts, > ;-) but those who do, may not be sure this setup is intentional. Probably. David