From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] riscv: mm: Avoid spurious fault after hotplugging vmemmap
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 13:38:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <214FC970-465A-4E45-98C0-17978D63DE89@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5fac578c-ff97-4721-96f3-8ba495f0556a@iscas.ac.cn>
> On Jul 6, 2026, at 13:04, Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>
> [ powerpc maintainers: Thoughts on replacing the ptesync in
> vmemmap_set_pmd() with a flush_cache_vmap() post-vmemmap-hotplug in the
> generic code? ]
>
> On 7/6/26 11:00, Muchun Song wrote:
>>> On Jun 30, 2026, at 15:51, Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>>>
>>> section_activate() does not flush TLB after populating new vmemmap
>>> pages. On most architectures, this is okay. However it is a problem on
>>> RISC-V since there the TLB caching non-present entries is permitted,
>>> which causes spurious faults on some hardwares.
>>>
>>> This seems to be most easily reproduced with DEBUG_VM=y and
>>> PAGE_POISONING=y, which causes these newly mapped struct pages to be
>>> poisoned i.e. written to immediately after mapping.
>>>
>>> Add a hook vmemmap_populate_finalize() in __populate_section_memmap()
>>> after population, to allow architectures to handle such situations as
>>> needed. Then implement it on RISC-V to arrange for the existing
>>> exception handler code to deal with these faults if they happen.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v4:
>>> - Rebase on v7.2-rc1, drop dependencies
>>> - (No code changes otherwise)
>>> - (A concurrency fix for mark_new_valid_map was sent independently)
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20260629-riscv-mm-new-valid-map-ordering-v1-1-60d8c10c6292@iscas.ac.cn/
>>> - Link to v3: https://patch.msgid.link/20260605-mark-after-vmemmap-populate-v3-1-a06001ac9264@iscas.ac.cn
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Merged back into one patch (Mike)
>>> - (No code changes otherwise.)
>>> - Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20260604-mark-after-vmemmap-populate-v2-0-ab6a7d03b434@iscas.ac.cn
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Split patch in two, hook point and riscv hook
>>> - Explain hook necessity in patch 1 message (Mike)
>>> - Make hook #define based (Mike)
>>> - Call finalize hook only on populate success
>>> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260525-mark-after-vmemmap-populate-v1-1-e698d859ba16@iscas.ac.cn
>>> ---
>>> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 4 ++++
>>> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 6 ++++++
>>> mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> index 5d5756bda82e..6b000c990ba7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>> @@ -1253,6 +1253,10 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte)
>>> #define TASK_SIZE FIXADDR_START
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +/* Needed on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP */
>>> +#define vmemmap_populate_finalize vmemmap_populate_finalize
>>> +void __meminit vmemmap_populate_finalize(void);
>>> +
>>> #else /* CONFIG_MMU */
>>>
>>> #define PAGE_SHARED __pgprot(0)
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
>>> index 5b1b3c88b4d1..800cb5c007d1 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
>>> @@ -1372,6 +1372,12 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node,
>>> */
>>> return vmemmap_populate_hugepages(start, end, node, altmap);
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +void __meminit vmemmap_populate_finalize(void)
>>> +{
>>> + /* Avoid faults on cached non-present TLB entries. */
>>> + mark_new_valid_map();
>>> +}
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_MMU) && defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
>>> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
>>> index 99e2be39671b..290cafcfd723 100644
>>> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
>>> @@ -544,6 +544,12 @@ static int __meminit vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
>>>
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +#ifndef vmemmap_populate_finalize
>>> +static void __meminit vmemmap_populate_finalize(void)
>>> +{
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> struct page * __meminit __populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
>>> unsigned long nr_pages, int nid, struct vmem_altmap *altmap,
>>> struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
>>> @@ -564,6 +570,8 @@ struct page * __meminit __populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
>>> if (r < 0)
>>> return NULL;
>>>
>>> + vmemmap_populate_finalize();
>> Does the hook of flush_cache_vmap() work for you? From the document of
>> cachetlb.rst, it said:
>>
>> 6) ``void flush_cache_vmap(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)``
>> ``void flush_cache_vunmap(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)``
>>
>> Here in these two interfaces we are flushing a specific range
>> of (kernel) virtual addresses from the cache. After running,
>> there will be no entries in the cache for the kernel address
>> space for virtual addresses in the range 'start' to 'end-1'.
>>
>> It seems that flush_cache_vmap() is supposed to be called after a new kernel
>> mapping has been installed, but before this address range is accessed.
>
> Good point. I had initially avoided flush_cache_vmap() because, to be
> honest, it looked scary. But the combination of "have vmemmap" and "have
> flush_cache_vmap()" is much less scary.
>
> I'd need to drop the address range check in RISC-V's flush_cache_vmap(),
> but might as well.
No. Please a new check for vmemmap address range.
>
>> Therefore, invoking flush_cache_vmap() here aligns perfectly with its interface
>> definition. But how would this change impact other architectures? Currently,
>> among architectures where CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y, only RISC-V and PowerPC provide
>> a concrete implementation for flush_cache_vmap().
>>
>> For PowerPC, the implementation is as follows:
>>
>> static inline void flush_cache_vmap(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> {
>> asm volatile("ptesync" ::: "memory");
>> }
>>
>> Here, flush_cache_vmap() is also intended to supply the ptesync instruction
>> that the kernel address mapping lacks. However, flush_cache_vmap() is not
>> called in the __populate_section_memmap() path. So, how does PowerPC ensure
>> ptesync is executed there? The answer lies in the architecture-specific
>> vmemmap_set_pmd(), which injects the necessary ptesync.
>>
>> If we choose to reuse flush_cache_vmap() in the generic path, it yields the
>> following benefits:
>>
>> - Avoids architectural churn: We do not need to introduce a new hook
>> like vmemmap_populate_finalize().
>> - Cleans up arch code: PowerPC can deprecate its custom vmemmap_set_pmd()
>> and migrate to the generic implementation.
>>
>> Let me know if this rationale makes sense, or if there are any hidden edge
>> cases I might have overlooked regarding other architectures.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Muchun
>
> At least on the face of it, it makes sense. The main thing is I don't
> know much about powerpc. So I'm also hoping powerpc maintainers could
> chime in.
You do not need to know about powerpc since the change of powerpc is not
a part of this patch. It should be a separate code clean up for powerpc.
>
> I also don't know how this would affect new archs, but if they need
> flush_cache_vmap() they *probably* also want this treatment for vmemmap
> hotplug? I guess we can deal with that when it happens.
>
> Thanks,
> Vivian "dramforever" Wang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 7:51 [PATCH v4] riscv: mm: Avoid spurious fault after hotplugging vmemmap Vivian Wang
2026-07-01 4:11 ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-01 5:01 ` Vivian Wang
2026-07-01 5:33 ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-06 3:00 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-06 5:04 ` Vivian Wang
2026-07-06 5:38 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-07-06 5:48 ` Vivian Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=214FC970-465A-4E45-98C0-17978D63DE89@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox