From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753073AbbJaAX4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:23:56 -0400 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:45748 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751981AbbJaAXx convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 20:23:53 -0400 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Caesar Wang , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Caesar Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more compatible Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 00:47:11 +0100 Message-ID: <21587719.mnFBFBzBeI@phil> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.2.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.14.13; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <56334995.6090103@linaro.org> References: <1443147298-12603-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> <5632E765.4010207@gmail.com> <56334995.6090103@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Daniel, Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015, 11:42:29 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: > On 10/30/2015 04:43 AM, Caesar Wang wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > 在 2015年10月01日 03:14, Heiko Stübner 写道: > >> Hi Daniel, > >> > >> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 06:18:03 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: > >>> On 09/25/2015 04:14 AM, Caesar Wang wrote: > >>>> Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform, > >>>> There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip. > >>>> > >>>> Says: > >>>> /tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at operand > >>>> 1 -- > >>>> `dsb` > >>>> ... > >>>> > >>>> The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64, > >>>> Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).The "sy" param > >>>> is the default which you are allow to omit, so on arm32 dsb()and > >>>> dsb(sy) > >>>> are the same. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang > >>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano > >> as you have "just" Acked these patches, I guess you are expecting them > >> to go > >> through the same tree as the devicetree changes, right? > > > > I'm wonder if someone will apply this series patchs but the wait.:-) > > In fact, I'm no sure that the Acked is really meaning.:- > > Yes, by acking the patch I say I am ok with it and I agree it can go > through another tree. although I guess the two clocksource changes could very well just go through your tree. dsb() -> dsb(sy) is supposed to be equal and the second one is just cosmetics. The Kconfig and dts changes need to wait in any case for 4.5 ... but I guess that may be true for the clocksource changes as well? Heiko