From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2010-04-28-16-53 uploaded
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:47:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21637.1272653269@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:02:27 EDT." <1272650547.10027.97.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2376 bytes --]
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:02:27 EDT, Lee Schermerhorn said:
> Would you have time to try a few patches? I've been doing some rework
> of the generic percpu numa_node/numa_mem patches. This rework should
> solve the build problem you encountered.
Not sure if I bollixed up adding the patches to the series file, that
section now looks like:
% grep -n ^numa series
1465:numa-add-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation.patch
1466:numa-add-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix1.patch
1467:numa-add-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix2.patch
1468:numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation.patch
1469:numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix1.patch
1470:numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix2.patch
1471:numa-ia64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation.patch
1473:numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id.patch
1474:numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id-fix.patch
1475:numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id-fix2.patch
1476:numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id-fix3.patch
1477:numa-ia64-support-numa_mem_id-for-memoryless-nodes.patch
1478:numa-slab-use-numa_mem_id-for-slab-local-memory-node.patch
1479:numa-in-kernel-profiling-use-cpu_to_mem-for-per-cpu-allocations.patch
1480:numa-update-documentation-vm-numa-add-memoryless-node-info.patch
1481:numa-update-documentation-vm-numa-add-memoryless-node-info-fix1.patch
and it dies with:
LANG=C make
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
CC arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
from include/linux/kmod.h:22,
from include/linux/module.h:13,
from include/linux/crypto.h:21,
from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets_64.c:8,
from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:4:
include/linux/topology.h:246: error: redefinition of 'numa_node_id'
/usr/src/linux-2.6.34-rc5-mmotm0428/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h:163: note: previous definition of 'numa_node_id' was here
make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make: *** [prepare0] Error 2
X86_64 build, CONFIG_NUMA=n - looks like include/linux/topology.h doesn't
play nice in the !CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID case...
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-30 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-28 23:53 mmotm 2010-04-28-16-53 uploaded akpm
2010-04-29 21:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-04-29 21:53 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-29 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-30 12:11 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-04-30 18:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-04-30 18:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2010-04-30 19:05 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-02 17:38 ` mmotm 2010-04-28 - nouveau driver issues Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-02 17:46 ` mmotm 2010-04-28 - RCU whinges Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-03 5:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 5:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 5:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 5:55 ` David Miller
2010-05-10 15:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-10 15:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 15:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 16:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-10 16:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-10 15:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-10 16:12 ` David Miller
2010-05-10 16:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-05-03 14:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-03 14:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 14:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 15:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-05-03 15:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-03 16:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 18:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-03 19:46 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: if6_get_next() fix Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 20:09 ` David Miller
2010-05-03 20:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 20:24 ` David Miller
2010-05-03 20:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-03 22:17 ` David Miller
2010-05-03 22:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-03 22:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-03 22:54 ` David Miller
2010-05-10 16:53 ` mmotm 2010-04-28 - RCU whinges Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21637.1272653269@localhost \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).