public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Cc: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>, Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>,
	Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>,
	"David L. Parsley" <parsley@linuxjedi.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints?
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:51:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21657.988116692@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0104240639580.6992-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0104240639580.6992-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>


viro@math.psu.edu said:
>  What I would like to avoid is scenario like
> Maintainers of filesystems with large private inodes: Why would we
> separate them? We would only waste memory, since the other filesystems
> stay in ->u and keep it large.

> Maintainers of the rest of filesystems: Since there's no patches that
> would take large stuff out of ->u, why would we bother?

> So yes, IMO having such patches available _is_ a good thing. And in
> 2.5 we definitely want them in the tree. If encapsulation part gets
> there during 2.4 and separate allocation is available for all of them
> it will be easier to do without PITA in process.

JFFS2 has the encapsulation part already. I'll make it do separate 
allocation in 2.5, when it's actually a gain.

--
dwmw2



  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-24 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-22 16:32 hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? David L. Parsley
2001-04-22 16:41 ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-23 11:43 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-04-23 13:17   ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-23 14:54     ` Christoph Rohland
2001-04-23 15:23       ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-23 15:36         ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-23 20:45           ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-23 20:56             ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-04-23 22:00               ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-23 22:10                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-23 21:19             ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-23 22:42               ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-04-23 22:49                 ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-23 23:07                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-23 23:13                     ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-23 23:24                     ` Rik van Riel
2001-04-23 22:47             ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-24  1:37             ` Jan Harkes
2001-04-24  2:53               ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-24  9:58                 ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-24 10:07                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-24 10:19                     ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-24 10:35                     ` Christoph Rohland
2001-04-24 10:54                       ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-24 12:51                         ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2001-04-24 13:34                         ` Christoph Rohland
2001-04-24 16:52                           ` David L. Parsley
2001-05-05  7:48                             ` [Patch] inline symlinks for tmpfs Christoph Rohland
2001-05-04 19:17                           ` [Patch] encapsulate shmem access to shmem_inode_info Christoph Rohland
     [not found]                             ` <3AF405FC.11D37FEB@bellsouth.net>
2001-05-06 13:58                               ` [Resend] Collection of tmpfs patches Christoph Rohland
2001-04-24 16:04                         ` Can't read SCSI TAPE Masaki Tsuji
2001-04-24 18:36                         ` hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Andreas Dilger
2001-04-24 18:49                           ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-24 19:11                             ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-24 22:01                             ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-24 21:59                 ` Trond Myklebust
2001-04-24 22:09                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-24 22:31                     ` Trond Myklebust
2001-04-24  6:33           ` Christoph Rohland
2001-04-23 14:08   ` David L. Parsley
2001-04-23 14:14     ` Alexander Viro
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-24  0:16 Ed Tomlinson
2001-04-24  3:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-24 10:01   ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-24 13:27     ` Erik Mouw
2001-04-24 18:47       ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-24 18:52         ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-24 20:45         ` Erik Mouw
2001-04-25  7:25         ` Christoph Rohland
2001-04-25 18:39     ` Andreas Dilger
2001-04-25 18:47       ` Alexander Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21657.988116692@redhat.com \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=cr@sap.com \
    --cc=ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
    --cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parsley@linuxjedi.org \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox