From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: J Sloan <jjs@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.11-pre vs Red Hat, ac kernels
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 13:29:17 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21778.1002425357@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 06 Oct 2001 09:21:32 MST." <3BBF2F8C.7F3D72E1@pobox.com>
On Sat, 06 Oct 2001 09:21:32 -0700,
J Sloan <jjs@pobox.com> wrote:
>With any 2.4.11-pre kernel so far, the machine locks
>up hard within seconds of starting a dbench run.
>No log entries, and SysRq keys have no effect -
>The power button is the only option in this case.
Does kdb + the NMI watchdog drop into the debugger and can you get a
backtrace? ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/kdb/download/ix86, boot with
"nmi_watchdog=1".
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-07 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-06 16:21 2.4.11-pre vs Red Hat, ac kernels J Sloan
2001-10-07 3:29 ` Keith Owens [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21778.1002425357@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au \
--to=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=jjs@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox