From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
"olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Suggestion] ARM64: kernel: compiling issue, need implement cmpxchg64 with assembler language.
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 09:32:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2182812.ymprEm6XBb@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5171FD67.2080104@asianux.com>
On Saturday 20 April 2013 10:28:55 Chen Gang wrote:
>
> -------------------------------patch begin--------------------------------------
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> index 968b5cb..b572d2b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> @@ -170,4 +170,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
> (unsigned long)(n), \
> sizeof(*(ptr))))
>
> +#define cmpxchg64(ptr,o,n) cmpxchg((ptr),(o),(n))
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_CMPXCHG_H */
Yes, this looks good. Please provide the same for cmpxchg64_local.
> -------------------------------patch end----------------------------------------
>
>
>
> I think, we can also reference the implementation of s390:
> it is in arch/s390/include/asm/cmpxchg.h.
> since we are ARM64, excluding ARM(32,16...), we can only consider 64-bit.
> if in the future, ARM64 and ARM are merged together:
> we can use CONFIG_64BIT to switch the cmpxchg64 definition.
> if define CONFIG_64BIT, use cmpxchg instead of cmpxchg64.
> else, use the definition of ARM (arch/arm/include/asm/cmpxchg.h already defines cmpxchg64)
I would not worry aobut merging the two at the moment.
> -------------------------------reference begin----------------------------------
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> #define cmpxchg64(ptr, o, n) \
> ({ \
> cmpxchg((ptr), (o), (n)); \
> })
> #else /* CONFIG_64BIT */
> ...
> -------------------------------reference end------------------------------------
This implementation in unnecessarily verbose, I think the one you have
above is nicer.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-20 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-19 11:45 [Suggestion] ARM64: kernel: compiling issue, need implement cmpxchg64 with assembler language Chen Gang
2013-04-19 12:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-20 2:28 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-20 7:32 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-04-22 5:08 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-22 5:08 ` [PATCH] ARM64: kernel: compiling issue, define cmpxchg64 and cmpxchg64_local for outside using Chen Gang
2013-04-23 10:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-04-23 10:54 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2182812.ymprEm6XBb@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox