From: "Petr Vandrovec" <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>
To: dalecki@evision.ag
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: IDE lockups with 2.5.28...
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 19:22:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <218BBF1744@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> (raw)
Martin,
can you explain what local_irq_disable() in do_request in
drivers/ide/ide.c should guard against? There is dozen (all unless I
missed something) of paths which do not local_irq_enable(), and neither
does the caller...
And what you meant with (endless) loop in ide_do_request?
And where do_request() callers obtain channel lock so that do_request()
can release and reacquire it?
My problem is that fsck reliable dies between 79.6 and 81% of its
run - on UP machine with SMP kernel:
NMI detected lockup on CPU0 ...
Stack trace: do_request + 315/924
do_ide_request
generic_unplug_device
blk_run_queues
do_page_cache_readahead
page_cache_readahead
do_generic_file_read
generic_file_read
file_read_actor
vfs_read
sys_read
do_request+315 is clear_bit(IDE_BUSY, channel->active) at line 606.
The do_ide_request()'s loop
while (!test_and_set_bit(IDE_BUSY, ch->active)) {
do_request(ch)
}
looks very suspicious to me - it will loop here until the end of world,
as there is nothing in queue, so do_request() will always exit
with IDE_BUSY cleared.
Next question is: with this stack trace, where you obtained ch->lock,
so that do_request() can do call to spin_unlock(ch->lock) ? It looks
to me like that I should get 'unlocking unlocked spinlock' with
appropriate debug.
What (probably) happened is that hardware finished request before
spin_lock_irq(ch->lock) (at line 749) was executed, we quit with
IDE_BUSY cleared, and it was last thing we did... Maybe I should
go back to IDE-98?
Thanks,
Petr Vandrovec
vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
next reply other threads:[~2002-07-25 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-25 17:22 Petr Vandrovec [this message]
2002-07-26 2:09 ` IDE lockups with 2.5.28 Marcin Dalecki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-26 10:00 Petr Vandrovec
2002-07-26 10:30 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-26 10:30 Petr Vandrovec
2002-07-26 10:31 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-26 10:46 Petr Vandrovec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=218BBF1744@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz \
--to=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=dalecki@evision.ag \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox