From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754420AbYCMMdB (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:33:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752448AbYCMMcx (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:32:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:52321 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752216AbYCMMcx (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:32:53 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20080312150042.96668bcd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080312150042.96668bcd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> To: Andrew Morton Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: pm_register() and pm_send_all() X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3+cvs; nmh 1.2-20070115cvs; GNU Emacs 23.0.50 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:31:37 +0000 Message-ID: <21968.1205411497@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > pm_send_all() has just a handful of callers: What should be done instead of calling pm_send_all()? David