From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 10:56:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 10:56:26 -0400 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:6898 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 10:56:09 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <3742.997627694@ocs3.ocs-net> In-Reply-To: <3742.997627694@ocs3.ocs-net> To: Keith Owens Cc: kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 1.1 is available. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 15:56:07 +0100 Message-ID: <21969.997628167@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org kaos@ocs.com.au said: > If you allow creation of a file in one directory but storing it in > another then you have to search all makefiles to find out what is > created in any directory. Horrible! Fine. But what's stopping us from putting a makefile in the asm-$(ARCH)/include directory? There are already automatically generated files in there. What have you already done for stuff like asm-arm/mach-types.h? -- dwmw2