From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84BBC12DDB0; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 13:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712667614; cv=none; b=feuYLaokAa62CH5ZOTrbkrSoS/PgQTXvAalX79mCxhqBYzaRfEjh2bW5JgV66PdTuWn+3JzKEgLm28wqDG9eT48FnXtwuTRu4aOmrw8jPI9NhiIKSB+CZKlMpTROLJwKtdi+O6utFCYfQXMUNx7VYhQgOAA5ZZyVWveRciA2RTk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712667614; c=relaxed/simple; bh=t5r6dEc4u5E4PiDu2jwLXpYVRAhdOQAi2gPnB6n/Xl4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Cc:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=dPoS9EaV6X0sPZAeSF9HvBJtCp5A31et15BoREoKmAySPYHvJaN8HxRHcZHkuN7142qjKzLycUBXc6cOMHVccgz9eowWehc1SE2H+lp0CxckukLwWYbQVG3fFx6ivoUMdvUmvmYoGdRR+fLKaMIoDbkoJuCGSL7vHzGQRrm893A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=5OiQGvD7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="5OiQGvD7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1712667610; bh=t5r6dEc4u5E4PiDu2jwLXpYVRAhdOQAi2gPnB6n/Xl4=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=5OiQGvD7axFiUJem0skEujBB3FJUsOqa8tiYES6UVyUJFgHmoCKC1zok06I7SA8Xq Vgq6X6hTN3Qq2f/Tg6OTgutyepD4O4DKLurqpbfe/rbW4zBXx3BnMMeU8YMPMyyf7t JQ7IReNSoakpdea71ct8clLTbubfiOrJ9HT598qm4z+lsS2C30eUf1mZ/veWAZ5/Zz cm1zr7sCxa6ZJcNKU742cin8jhFKQdO8VVbFBzMlWXpQpb5y4sWagvcIay8hq5YFOw YB6vDxJnSmGIXe7VsFrx538nve+eB+3+VQ+Y7DLeC+lAUoAHRA7usOQfpSDpBf9bam ND/Rh1oCXnj6Q== Received: from [10.193.1.1] (broslavsky.collaboradmins.com [68.183.210.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: usama.anjum) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C83237813CA; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 13:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2196cc49-e5da-432b-bc35-64d55623749d@collabora.com> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 18:00:38 +0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 6/9] selftests: cgroup: Add basic tests for pids controller To: Waiman Long , =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= References: <20240405170548.15234-1-mkoutny@suse.com> <20240405170548.15234-7-mkoutny@suse.com> <41dd9c5a-0e07-4b98-9dfb-fb57eaa74fa2@collabora.com> <4bae7682-801e-498f-88c9-9c9d45364bfc@collabora.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Muhammad Usama Anjum In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 4/9/24 5:12 AM, Waiman Long wrote: > > On 4/8/24 08:04, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: >> On 4/8/24 5:01 PM, Michal Koutný wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 04:53:11PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum >>> wrote: >>>> ksft_test_result_report(tests[i].fn(root), tests[i].name) >>> $ git grep ksft_test_result_report v6.9-rc3 -- >>> (empty result) >>> >>> I can't find that helper. Is that in some devel repositories? >> Sorry, I always do development on next. So it has been added recently. Try >> searching it on next: >> >> git grep ksft_test_result_report next-20240404 -- > > I don't believe it is a good idea to make this patch having a dependency on > another set of patches in -next because the test won't run in a non-next > environment. We can always have additional patches later on to modify the > tests to use the newly available APIs. Sure, it is okay with me. > > Cheers, > Longman > >> >>> Michal > > -- BR, Muhammad Usama Anjum