From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261881AbVCZAHn (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:07:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261885AbVCZAHn (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:07:43 -0500 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.201]:48091 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261881AbVCZAHi (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:07:38 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Fb1nMfAyLOvR49ZkSE6503sFbMwyz64gs1Jlt4XanaYRgV75+F9F5z5rUoWr24z3q7VWlLaPKzaAAWAGwnMGmaGokD8p8gA74JpdnPB7bPz5P3Fmy+GXoOxPEmN4fGPfZDXOcv/Xh6qJ/rFV81r2zpvWjzFBqFnmBLRyG+u61uc= Message-ID: <21d7e99705032516071cdd586f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:07:38 +1100 From: Dave Airlie Reply-To: Dave Airlie To: C M Subject: Re: Feature Request Into Kernel - Savage DRM to be added as a selectable DRM module in the kernel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I was hopeing that it could be added as a selectable DRM module in the > kernel such as the ati rage and such are. This is a tested driver, > proven working for most, making it selectable in the kernel would be > very much appreciated and a great advancment for all savage users. The > savage users have for long been without opengl, now the time comes > when it can happen, i was sincerley hoping that this could be added > into the kernel. i was hoping it will become part in the list of > selectable DRM in the gentoo kernel, vanilla, etc.. whatever it is > easier to include it in. I would appericate a responce on your > thoughts, and im here for testing if needed. > Its on my list of things.. just not as high up as some other things.. it needs a full code review by a few people which means a lot of time, it may also need to be cleaned up to kernel coding standards.... I might submit a patch for review soon... Dave.