From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755393Ab0CDXDH (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:03:07 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f175.google.com ([209.85.223.175]:46414 "EHLO mail-iw0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752254Ab0CDXDE (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:03:04 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=SL6oGefhcfMI8eoNXFhWDsysBkE67y2bUwg0w5RmInzqfUM0NZ//SpEqpEBrM7Bk56 SZ6ZRJsP7CHm2U4FSiBd2Rukgte6CVc8DgacvO+HqxiYaJJgU9LjCjp23pk0p6XzjyFb nPXDioRqXvdMSfLNFgsXny6Ax3ajvAi6aPYkA= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20100304190450.GA23807@srcf.ucam.org> <20100304192524.GA24253@srcf.ucam.org> <20100304195302.GA24856@srcf.ucam.org> <6a89f9d51003041257j39fde3b6y8bd3336d77f7cf7a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:03:03 +1000 Message-ID: <21d7e9971003041503p726ecbebi4b0b97854c5824de@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3 From: Dave Airlie To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Stephane Marchesin , Matthew Garrett , Dave Airlie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Stephane Marchesin wrote: >> >> In short, the "don't break user space interfaces" principle is making >> user space code quality worse for everyone. And it makes our lives as >> graphics developers pretty miserable actually > > And _my_ point is that if you did a half-way decent job on versioning, you > wouldn't be in the crappy situation you are now. > > For chissake, the DRM versioning model is a total disaster. The reason you > can never ever break user space interfaces is exactly because when you > break them, X stops working. Stop aligning DRM versioning with nouveau versioning. This isn't a generic problem with DRM, we've supported versioning interfaces for years and have broken them maybe once. > What I suggested is to _keep_ a working model across different versions, > so that you can get out of the rat-hole you are in now (and the rat-hole > you put your users into, and the distributions). > > It's simply _not_ acceptable to tie the X server and the kernel version so > tightly together as the crazy DRM model does right now. It's not all that > different from us requiring people to install a new glibc every once in a > while, just because we added a new filesystem. Everybody understands that > that would be totally insane. > > Why does the X community not understand simple library versioning? Its nouveau project not X not DRM, stop generalising the situation. Dave.