From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: will@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] iommu: Optimise PCI SAC address trick
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:53:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21e49cd7-ee15-5ebd-7805-37d5f347635f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8502b115b915d2a3fabde367e099e39106686c8.1681392791.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Robin,
On 4/13/2023 7:10 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Per the reasoning in commit 4bf7fda4dce2 ("iommu/dma: Add config for
> PCI SAC address trick") and its subsequent revert, this mechanism no
> longer serves its original purpose, but now only works around broken
> hardware/drivers in a way that is unfortunately too impactful to remove.
>
> This does not, however, prevent us from solving the performance impact
> which that workaround has on large-scale systems that don't need it.
> Once the 32-bit IOVA space fills up and a workload starts allocating and
> freeing on both sides of the boundary, the opportunistic SAC allocation
> can then end up spending significant time hunting down scattered
> fragments of free 32-bit space, or just reestablishing max32_alloc_size.
> This can easily be exacerbated by a change in allocation pattern, such
> as by changing the network MTU, which can increase pressure on the
> 32-bit space by leaving a large quantity of cached IOVAs which are now
> the wrong size to be recycled, but also won't be freed since the
> non-opportunistic allocations can still be satisfied from the whole
> 64-bit space without triggering the reclaim path.
>
> However, in the context of a workaround where smaller DMA addresses
> aren't simply a preference but a necessity, if we get to that point at
> all then in fact it's already the endgame. The nature of the allocator
> is currently such that the first IOVA we give to a device after the
> 32-bit space runs out will be the highest possible address for that
> device, ever. If that works, then great, we know we can optimise for
> speed by always allocating from the full range. And if it doesn't, then
> the worst has already happened and any brokenness is now showing, so
> there's little point in continuing to try to hide it.
>
> To that end, implement a flag to refine the SAC business into a
> per-device policy that can automatically get itself out of the way if
> and when it stops being useful.
>
> CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
We hit kernel softlockup while running stress-ng test system having 384 CPU and
NVMe disk. This patch helped to solve one soft lockup in allocation path.
> ---
>
> v4: Rebase to use the new bitfield in dev_iommu, expand commit message.
>
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.h | 8 ++++++++
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 3 +++
> include/linux/iommu.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 99b2646cb5c7..9193ad5bc72f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ static dma_addr_t iommu_dma_alloc_iova(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> {
> struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie = domain->iova_cookie;
> struct iova_domain *iovad = &cookie->iovad;
> - unsigned long shift, iova_len, iova = 0;
> + unsigned long shift, iova_len, iova;
>
> if (cookie->type == IOMMU_DMA_MSI_COOKIE) {
> cookie->msi_iova += size;
> @@ -645,15 +645,29 @@ static dma_addr_t iommu_dma_alloc_iova(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> if (domain->geometry.force_aperture)
> dma_limit = min(dma_limit, (u64)domain->geometry.aperture_end);
>
> - /* Try to get PCI devices a SAC address */
> - if (dma_limit > DMA_BIT_MASK(32) && !iommu_dma_forcedac && dev_is_pci(dev))
> + /*
> + * Try to use all the 32-bit PCI addresses first. The original SAC vs.
> + * DAC reasoning loses relevance with PCIe, but enough hardware and
> + * firmware bugs are still lurking out there that it's safest not to
> + * venture into the 64-bit space until necessary.
> + *
> + * If your device goes wrong after seeing the notice then likely either
> + * its driver is not setting DMA masks accurately, the hardware has
> + * some inherent bug in handling >32-bit addresses, or not all the
> + * expected address bits are wired up between the device and the IOMMU.
> + */
> + if (dma_limit > DMA_BIT_MASK(32) && dev->iommu->pci_32bit_workaround) {
> iova = alloc_iova_fast(iovad, iova_len,
> DMA_BIT_MASK(32) >> shift, false);
> + if (iova)
> + goto done;
>
> - if (!iova)
> - iova = alloc_iova_fast(iovad, iova_len, dma_limit >> shift,
> - true);
> + dev->iommu->pci_32bit_workaround = false;
> + dev_notice(dev, "Using %d-bit DMA addresses\n", bits_per(dma_limit));
May be dev_notice_once? Otherwise we may see this message multiple time for same
device like below:
[ 172.017120] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.022955] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.028720] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.031815] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.031816] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.038727] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.038726] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.038917] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.038968] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.038970] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.039007] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.039091] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
[ 172.039102] nvme 0000:41:00.0: Using 64-bit DMA addresses
Otherwise patch worked fine for us.
Tested-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
-Vasant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-18 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 13:40 [PATCH v4] iommu: Optimise PCI SAC address trick Robin Murphy
2023-04-13 14:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-14 11:45 ` Joerg Roedel
2023-04-14 17:45 ` Robin Murphy
2023-05-23 16:06 ` Joerg Roedel
2023-05-24 14:56 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-13 17:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-15 7:49 ` John Garry
2023-06-15 9:04 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-15 10:11 ` John Garry
2023-06-15 11:41 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-15 12:15 ` John Garry
2023-04-18 9:23 ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2023-04-18 10:19 ` John Garry
2023-04-18 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-04-18 18:50 ` John Garry
2023-04-18 10:57 ` Robin Murphy
2023-04-18 13:05 ` Vasant Hegde
2023-07-14 14:09 ` Joerg Roedel
2023-07-17 9:24 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21e49cd7-ee15-5ebd-7805-37d5f347635f@amd.com \
--to=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox