From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] Stop gcc 4.1.0 optimizing wait_hpet_tick away
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:14:04 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22166.1164950044@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:05:51 -0800." <20061130210551.e5ca0f29.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton (on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:05:51 -0800) wrote:
>On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:14:10 +0100
>Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
>
>> Then why not simply check for gcc 4.1.0 in compiler.h and refuse to build
>> with 4.1.0 if it's known to produce bad code ?
>
>Think so. I'll queue this and see how many howls it causes.
>
>--- a/init/main.c~gcc-4-1-0-is-bust
>+++ a/init/main.c
>@@ -75,6 +75,10 @@
> #error Sorry, your GCC is too old. It builds incorrect kernels.
> #endif
>
>+#if __GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 1 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ == 0
>+#error gcc-4.1.0 is known to miscompile the kernel. Please use a different compiler version.
>+#endif
>+
> static int init(void *);
>
> extern void init_IRQ(void);
SuSE's SLES10 ships with gcc 4.1.0. There is nothing to stop a
distributor from backporting the bug fix from gcc 4.1.1 to 4.1.0, but
this patch would not allow the fixed compiler to build the kernel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-01 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-29 2:22 [patch 2.6.19-rc6] Stop gcc 4.1.0 optimizing wait_hpet_tick away Keith Owens
2006-11-29 3:08 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-11-29 3:56 ` Keith Owens
2006-11-29 4:04 ` David Miller
2006-11-29 4:30 ` Keith Owens
2006-11-29 4:57 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-11-30 1:04 ` David Schwartz
2006-12-01 5:50 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-12-01 11:24 ` David Schwartz
2006-12-01 12:08 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-12-01 13:52 ` David Schwartz
2006-12-02 9:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-12-01 12:31 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-12-01 14:03 ` David Schwartz
2006-12-02 10:39 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-12-03 4:29 ` David Schwartz
2006-12-07 14:02 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-12-08 4:22 ` David Schwartz
2006-11-29 9:08 ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-11-29 20:14 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-12-01 5:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-01 5:14 ` Keith Owens [this message]
2006-12-01 5:26 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-12-01 6:32 ` Keith Owens
2006-12-01 7:28 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-12-01 7:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22166.1164950044@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nmiell@comcast.net \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox