From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc: "Elaine Zhang" <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
"Adrián Martínez Larumbe" <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com>,
"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"Sebastian Reichel" <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wenst@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] pmdomain: rockchip: add regulator support
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 11:46:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2224005.vXnMlVU4IS@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240910180530.47194-6-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Am Dienstag, 10. September 2024, 19:57:14 CEST schrieb Sebastian Reichel:
> Some power domains require extra voltages to be applied. For example
> trying to enable the GPU domain on RK3588 fails when the SoC does not
> have VDD GPU enabled.
>
> The solution to temporarily change the device's device tree node has
> been taken over from the Mediatek power domain driver.
>
> The regulator is not acquired at probe time, since that creates circular
> dependencies. The power domain driver must be probed early, since SoC
> peripherals need it. Regulators on the other hand depend on SoC
> peripherals like SPI, I2C or GPIO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
It does look like Chen-Yu Tsai is working on a similar problem [0].
I.e. this really is a hack, so I started looking around the regulator API
and found of_regulator_bulk_get existing but unused that already
operates on a of-node.
Googling further I stumbled upon the linked patch from some days
ago ;-) . So maybe that could be a cleaner way forward?
[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20240904090016.2841572-6-wenst@chromium.org/
> ---
> drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> index 663d390faaeb..ae6990897928 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/of_clk.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> #include <soc/rockchip/pm_domains.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/power/px30-power.h>
> @@ -89,6 +90,8 @@ struct rockchip_pm_domain {
> u32 *qos_save_regs[MAX_QOS_REGS_NUM];
> int num_clks;
> struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
> + struct device_node *node;
> + struct regulator *supply;
> };
>
> struct rockchip_pmu {
> @@ -571,18 +574,67 @@ static int rockchip_pd_power(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd, bool power_on)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int rockchip_pd_regulator_disable(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd)
> +{
> + return pd->supply ? regulator_disable(pd->supply) : 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int rockchip_pd_regulator_enable(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd)
> +{
> + struct rockchip_pmu *pmu = pd->pmu;
> + struct device_node *main_node;
> +
> + if (!pd->supply) {
> + /*
> + * Find regulator in current power domain node.
> + * devm_regulator_get() finds regulator in a node and its child
> + * node, so set of_node to current power domain node then change
> + * back to original node after regulator is found for current
> + * power domain node.
> + */
> + main_node = pmu->dev->of_node;
> + pmu->dev->of_node = pd->node;
> + pd->supply = devm_regulator_get(pmu->dev, "domain");
> + pmu->dev->of_node = main_node;
> + if (IS_ERR(pd->supply)) {
> + pd->supply = NULL;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return regulator_enable(pd->supply);
> +}
> +
> static int rockchip_pd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
> {
> struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd = to_rockchip_pd(domain);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rockchip_pd_regulator_enable(pd);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(pd->pmu->dev, "Failed to enable supply: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> - return rockchip_pd_power(pd, true);
> + ret = rockchip_pd_power(pd, true);
> + if (ret)
> + rockchip_pd_regulator_disable(pd);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int rockchip_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
> {
> struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd = to_rockchip_pd(domain);
> + int ret;
>
> - return rockchip_pd_power(pd, false);
> + ret = rockchip_pd_power(pd, false);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + rockchip_pd_regulator_disable(pd);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int rockchip_pd_attach_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> @@ -663,6 +715,7 @@ static int rockchip_pm_add_one_domain(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
>
> pd->info = pd_info;
> pd->pmu = pmu;
> + pd->node = node;
>
> pd->num_clks = of_clk_get_parent_count(node);
> if (pd->num_clks > 0) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-11 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 17:57 [PATCH v1 0/6] Fix RK3588 GPU domain Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] pmdomain: rockchip: forward rockchip_do_pmu_set_power_domain errors Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-10 18:21 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] pmdomain: rockchip: cleanup mutex handling in rockchip_pd_power Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-10 18:23 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] pmdomain: rockchip: reduce indention " Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-10 18:26 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] dt-bindings: power: rockchip: add regulator support Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-10 18:52 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-09-11 17:38 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] pmdomain: " Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-11 9:46 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2024-09-16 12:37 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add GPU power domain regulator dependency for RK3588 Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] Fix RK3588 GPU domain Ulf Hansson
2024-09-19 9:05 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-09-16 15:45 ` Adrián Martínez Larumbe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2224005.vXnMlVU4IS@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=adrian.larumbe@collabora.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox