Re:Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: create cooling device based on ACPI

[wangyouwan <wangyouwan@126.com>]

Okay, thank you for the reminder! 
If I make this change, I'm not sure if it will work. If it does, I'll submit a new patch.

--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1494,8 +1494,13 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
        if (cpufreq_driver->ready)
                cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
 
-       if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
-               policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
+       if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver)) {
+               struct device_node *np = of_get_cpu_node(policy->cpu, NULL);
+               if (np)
+                       policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
+               else
+                       policy->cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);

+       }













At 2023-04-28 19:37:26, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:19 AM <wangyouwan@126.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: youwan Wang <wangyouwan@126.com>
>>
>> When using the "scpi_cpufreq" driver, an error
>> occurs:cpufreq_cooling: OF node not available for cpu*.
>> The current computer motherboard is using ACPI firmware.
>> Go to see that the error is caused by calling the
>> "of_cpufreq_cooling_register" interface.
>> comment:create cpufreq cooling device based on DT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: youwan Wang <wangyouwan@126.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 7 ++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> index 6b52ebe5a890..3418c68959d5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> @@ -1528,8 +1528,13 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
>>         if (cpufreq_driver->ready)
>>                 cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
>>
>> -       if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver))
>> +       if (cpufreq_thermal_control_enabled(cpufreq_driver)) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> +               policy->cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
>> +#else
>>                 policy->cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
>> +#endif
>
>Please avoid adding #ifdefs like this in random places.
>
>Moreover, what if the kernel supports ACPI and the platform is DT-based?
>
>> +       }
>>
>>         pr_debug("initialization complete\n");
>>
>> --