From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756578AbYE2QDt (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 12:03:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753278AbYE2QDm (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 12:03:42 -0400 Received: from vena.lwn.net ([206.168.112.25]:38089 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753006AbYE2QDm (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 12:03:42 -0400 To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, ksummit-2008-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Miller Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project From: corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 May 2008 16:17:19 +1000." <1212041839.8888.38.camel@pasglop> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 10:03:41 -0600 Message-ID: <22351.1212077021@vena.lwn.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ben H writes: > On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 22:58 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > > > Not to distract from your points, but I think it's been a huge > > mistake to not allow folks to work hard on technical issues > > during the summit. > > Having been stopped a couple of times last year when trying to bring > some technical subjects for the reason that they were "off topic, KS is > for process" I tend to agree :-) Here's an idea: the discussion list for the 2008 summit has opened up. This seems like an ideal time to make suggestions for technical topics which you think would be appropriate for this gathering. Failing that, you leave it up to the program committee to try to guess what's on everybody's minds, and that seems certain to disappoint a lot of people. jon