From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262042AbSJJBmR>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:42:17 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262697AbSJJBmQ>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:42:16 -0400
Received: from rj.SGI.COM ([192.82.208.96]:23214 "EHLO rj.sgi.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S262042AbSJJBmQ>;
	Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:42:16 -0400
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BK is *evil* corporate software 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:08:34 MST."
             <20021009180834.A9206@work.bitmover.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:47:48 +1000
Message-ID: <22401.1034214468@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:08:34 -0700, 
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:
>"does anything hurt?  No?  Go use CVS.  Come back when it hurts.
>If it never hurts you should never pay for BK".  

<plug>
For single users or a small team on a LAN, PRCS is much better than CVS
Change sets, branching, merging, easy extraction from any version ...
What is missing from PRCS is the distributed repository.  Even Larry
thinks that PRCS is good for single users.
http://prcs.sourceforge.net/
</plug>

prcs info linux-2.4 | wc -> 1179 changesets.