From: sidc7 <siddhartha.chhabra@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: COW optimization on exec
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22519869.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090315034134.GA9829@cmpxchg.org>
Thanks for clearing this
Johannes Weiner-5 wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 07:57:54PM -0700, sidc7 wrote:
>>
>> The Linux kernel uses the COW optimization for fork, so the processes
>> share
>> the same pages, till on of the processes writes to the page. I was
>> wondering, if I do a fork and do an exec immediately following the fork,
>> will the COW optimization still be applied as it is most likely that the
>> new
>> process is going to write to the shared pages? So doing a COW will not
>> give
>> much benefit here, if it is done at all. Can anyone clarify if COW will
>> be
>> applied in such a case, for e.g. a command shell.
>
> COWing the pages is not much extrawork, it's handled with this code:
>
> /*
> * If it's a COW mapping, write protect it both
> * in the parent and the child
> */
> if (is_cow_mapping(vm_flags)) {
> ptep_set_wrprotect(src_mm, addr, src_pte);
> pte = pte_wrprotect(pte);
> }
>
> you can find it in mm/memory.c::copy_one_pte(). The fault handler
> will then take care of it (it will notice that the pte is
> write-protected while the mapping itself allows writes) and then
> replace the page with a copy in the faulting process.
>
> The real overhead is copying the page tables in the first place. But
> the kernel can not know whether exec() is soon to be called, so fork()
> always must provide the copy-whole-address-space semantics.
>
> If the forking process knows in advance the child will exec
> immediately, it can use vfork() which doesn't copy the address space.
>
> Hannes
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/COW-optimization-on-exec-tp22519639p22519869.html
Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-15 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-15 2:57 COW optimization on exec sidc7
2009-03-15 3:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-15 4:20 ` sidc7 [this message]
2009-03-15 3:58 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-15 6:20 ` sidc7
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22519869.post@talk.nabble.com \
--to=siddhartha.chhabra@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox