public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sidc7 <siddhartha.chhabra@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: COW optimization on exec
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22519869.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090315034134.GA9829@cmpxchg.org>


Thanks for clearing this


Johannes Weiner-5 wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 07:57:54PM -0700, sidc7 wrote:
>> 
>> The Linux kernel uses the COW optimization for fork, so the processes
>> share
>> the same pages, till on of the processes writes to the page. I was
>> wondering, if I do a fork and do an exec immediately following the fork,
>> will the COW optimization still be applied as it is most likely that the
>> new
>> process is going to write to the shared pages? So doing a COW will not
>> give
>> much benefit here, if it is done at all. Can anyone clarify if COW will
>> be
>> applied in such a case, for e.g. a command shell.
> 
> COWing the pages is not much extrawork, it's handled with this code:
> 
>         /*
>          * If it's a COW mapping, write protect it both
>          * in the parent and the child
>          */
>         if (is_cow_mapping(vm_flags)) {
>                 ptep_set_wrprotect(src_mm, addr, src_pte);
>                 pte = pte_wrprotect(pte);
>         }
> 
> you can find it in mm/memory.c::copy_one_pte().  The fault handler
> will then take care of it (it will notice that the pte is
> write-protected while the mapping itself allows writes) and then
> replace the page with a copy in the faulting process.
> 
> The real overhead is copying the page tables in the first place.  But
> the kernel can not know whether exec() is soon to be called, so fork()
> always must provide the copy-whole-address-space semantics.
> 
> If the forking process knows in advance the child will exec
> immediately, it can use vfork() which doesn't copy the address space.
> 
> 	Hannes
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/COW-optimization-on-exec-tp22519639p22519869.html
Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-15  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-15  2:57 COW optimization on exec sidc7
2009-03-15  3:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-03-15  4:20   ` sidc7 [this message]
2009-03-15  3:58 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-15  6:20   ` sidc7

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22519869.post@talk.nabble.com \
    --to=siddhartha.chhabra@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox