From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1761209AbcAKX0L (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:26:11 -0500
Received: from vulcan.natalenko.name ([104.207.131.136]:28616 "EHLO
	vulcan.natalenko.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1761169AbcAKX0I convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:26:08 -0500
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 vulcan.natalenko.name 3A0BE79054
Authentication-Results: vulcan.natalenko.name; dmarc=none header.from=natalenko.name
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] tcp/ipv4: kernel panic because of (possible) division by zero
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 01:26:05 +0200
Message-ID: <2260281.VlLhvGfHoN@spock>
User-Agent: KMail/5.1 (Linux/4.3.0-pf3; KDE/5.17.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQynzxB7mFyprZnNzUUBNhtaibA+9LRGufDLjSw6QeZou2g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <26396443.iDTTxgChSj@spock> <3240923.Qg3kfz0Bvr@spock> <CADVnQynzxB7mFyprZnNzUUBNhtaibA+9LRGufDLjSw6QeZou2g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Compiled and booted OK, no issues so far, but I'd prefer to give it a several 
days test.

Thanks!

On понеділок, 11 січня 2016 р. 13:47:08 EET Neal Cardwell wrote:
> Great. Thanks for running that test! Yes, I think that's enough info.
> We sent a proposed upstream patch here:
> 
>   http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/566072/
>   tcp_yeah: don't set ssthresh below 2
> 
> Feel free to add your "Tested-By" to the thread if you have a chance
> to test that patch.