From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935166AbXG0KPT (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:15:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756154AbXG0KPF (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:15:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:33713 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753787AbXG0KPE (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:15:04 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <200707270944.LAA17167@ifs.emn.fr> References: <200707270944.LAA17167@ifs.emn.fr> To: Yoann Padioleau Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; nmh 1.2-20070115cvs; GNU Emacs 22.1.50 Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:14:57 +0100 Message-ID: <22618.1185531297@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yoann Padioleau wrote: > When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0. Can you make them of style: if (!x) instead? Thanks, David