From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 06/10] cpufreq: Use locking guard and __free() in cpufreq_update_policy()
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:44:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22654186.EfDdHjke4D@rjwysocki.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4651448.LvFx2qVVIh@rjwysocki.net>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Instead of using cpufreq_cpu_acquire() and cpufreq_cpu_release() in
cpufreq_update_policy(), which is the last user of these functions,
make it use __free() for policy reference counting cleanup and the
"write" locking guard for policy locking.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2752,23 +2752,23 @@
*/
void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_acquire(cpu);
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
+ policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
if (!policy)
return;
+ guard(cpufreq_policy_write)(policy);
+
/*
* BIOS might change freq behind our back
* -> ask driver for current freq and notify governors about a change
*/
if (cpufreq_driver->get && has_target() &&
(cpufreq_suspended || WARN_ON(!cpufreq_verify_current_freq(policy, false))))
- goto unlock;
+ return;
refresh_frequency_limits(policy);
-
-unlock:
- cpufreq_cpu_release(policy);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-28 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-28 20:36 [PATCH v1 00/10] cpufreq: cpufreq_update_limits() fix and some cleanups Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-28 20:39 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] cpufreq: Reference count policy in cpufreq_update_limits() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-29 2:02 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2025-03-29 11:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-04-01 16:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-15 13:08 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2025-04-15 13:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-28 20:40 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] cpufreq: Consolidate some code in cpufreq_online() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:32 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:41 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] cpufreq: Split cpufreq_online() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-04-01 8:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:42 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] cpufreq: Add and use cpufreq policy locking guards Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:43 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange max frequency updates handling code Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-07 18:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-28 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-04-01 8:46 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] cpufreq: Use locking guard and __free() in cpufreq_update_policy() Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:45 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] cpufreq: Drop cpufreq_cpu_acquire() and cpufreq_cpu_release() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:46 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] cpufreq: Use __free() for policy reference counting cleanup Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:47 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] cpufreq: Introduce cpufreq_policy_refresh() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-03-28 20:48 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] cpufreq: Pass policy pointer to ->update_limits() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-01 8:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-04-07 18:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-07 22:27 ` srinivas pandruvada
2025-04-07 23:49 ` Doug Smythies
2025-04-08 14:18 ` srinivas pandruvada
2025-04-08 11:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-08 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-08 17:47 ` srinivas pandruvada
2025-04-08 18:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-08 18:48 ` srinivas pandruvada
2025-04-01 16:57 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] cpufreq: cpufreq_update_limits() fix and some cleanups Mario Limonciello
2025-04-09 19:16 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22654186.EfDdHjke4D@rjwysocki.net \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox