From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Alex Tomas <bzzz@tmi.comex.ru>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext3
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 13:22:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <227420000.1047676948@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3zno3grfz.fsf@lexa.home.net>
SDET on my machine (16x NUMA-Q) has fallen in love with your patch,
and has decided to elope with it to a small desert island. This is
despite it's one disk hung off node 0, and the IO througput of a
slightly damp piece of cotton thread. Apologies for the loss of your
patch as it gets whisked away ;-)
M.
PS. Oh, I had this bit, per akpm-instructions: For best results, add ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp to struct ext2_bg_info
PPS. I'll try to run some more focused tests with aim7 over the weekend.
As if we needed it ...
-------------------------
DISCLAIMER: SPEC(tm) and the benchmark name SDET(tm) are registered
trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. This
benchmarking was performed for research purposes only, and the run results
are non-compliant and not-comparable with any published results.
Results are shown as percentages of the first set displayed
SDET 1 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.64-bk3-mjb3 100.0% 1.8%
2.5.64-mjb3-ext2 102.0% 1.1%
SDET 2 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.64-bk3-mjb3 100.0% 3.7%
2.5.64-mjb3-ext2 106.1% 3.1%
SDET 4 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.64-bk3-mjb3 100.0% 1.5%
2.5.64-mjb3-ext2 101.1% 2.1%
SDET 8 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.64-bk3-mjb3 100.0% 0.2%
2.5.64-mjb3-ext2 113.3% 0.7%
SDET 16 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.64-bk3-mjb3 100.0% 1.1%
2.5.64-mjb3-ext2 167.1% 0.8%
SDET 32 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.64-bk3-mjb3 100.0% 0.9%
2.5.64-mjb3-ext2 170.7% 0.1%
SDET 64 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.64-bk3-mjb3 100.0% 0.7%
2.5.64-mjb3-ext2 157.2% 0.5%
SDET 128 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.64-bk3-mjb3 100.0% 0.3%
2.5.64-mjb3-ext2 151.3% 0.8%
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-14 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-10 15:41 [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext3 Alex Tomas
2003-03-10 16:25 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-10 16:33 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-10 16:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-03-14 21:22 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-03-15 2:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-15 6:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=227420000.1047676948@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=bzzz@tmi.comex.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox