From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C15C82DB788 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 17:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769795859; cv=none; b=mneZwsQ+NfHKDSqejnGObG3xtoCB/ZLprfLbnLDzjXBkf+BcUCPHdn2L8QtwFfDSgZh2iA7XrTmEKzkjNtFzGG9AwgRwfrxGHTWDK7a5elXuig/tYxk5dY9d5jXeeAXzltorP5h+xv2XlUtpqyzx/ciaPbEL+OD7t2Uutu7FhDw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769795859; c=relaxed/simple; bh=V6i2FAXLo919/Gr5GBykceNTPZvT2DyLExxMrSsp8Y0=; h=From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=JKA59Pby0LPF92HKkkwbI6xaFeUwv/26R0X0JWkcvIVaDKWSwUrMffK1pUYmWO58zqQcu2eOrdiESExEVVC0vUll6NrkDlgebC2gilghsKOf2LYuHDyJHPDhgQdxms7KKuV05O/YJqxECsMQT3obcWZgDOhNOA5s1uqzPz7OLL0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Rbu4DdNY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Rbu4DdNY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1769795856; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=V6i2FAXLo919/Gr5GBykceNTPZvT2DyLExxMrSsp8Y0=; b=Rbu4DdNYtvr8pKLeIvnlcoviS7HaR3to9iYxF784QTWUuYjrMGk9NphsOvOZ5+nEtzlju8 OB2LwCnc8/pU3K1y7bNYSjxvA6P6VQQ35I1TBKlD9JCJRklSUi58uNSiR9wouSWOQfWIS+ ecWuQNzt8f5eHUJy24myyLqd6XCBYkA= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-681-OifsVORoPCK4ig1QJ8mwgA-1; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 12:57:35 -0500 X-MC-Unique: OifsVORoPCK4ig1QJ8mwgA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: OifsVORoPCK4ig1QJ8mwgA_1769795853 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B7AA1954B0C; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 17:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.44.33.164]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFE73000218; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 17:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: To: Sami Tolvanen Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Mark Brown , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Petr Pavlu Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the keys-next tree with the modules tree Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2274418.1769795849.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 17:57:29 +0000 Message-ID: <2274419.1769795849@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 Sami Tolvanen wrote: > Thanks, Mark. David, I see the patches in keys-next were updated just > a few hours ago. Would it make sense for you to rebase them on top of > next-20260129? Petr's patch removed the use_signed_attrs variable, so > we should ensure it's still initialized correctly. Otherwise the > resolution looks trivial. Wouldn't that mean having to rebase before sending to Linus? What's your branch that is being taken into linux-next? David