From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC6B5274FEB for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 21:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769810230; cv=none; b=EXxhmGnsodLpkCZSB1YSEFDjf+gj7r1sX/Dtm1vmN02XJXqyolBCQCyIRUWqU0N/IfQdldIXnvPrNj7Xz47F1C3ptRG2qnk3jeUK1s3qAJernPv1SX59tSZ/pt63awx8HzKR1jlfniNg7xWh45pghi/kCEvRi1vYFjFQxuH6tDI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769810230; c=relaxed/simple; bh=M6/5o4+JGea55KW7ZMzXhfR/yhFL4omJuIMlv4sdcn0=; h=From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=B62qRPlMwWPfbfjcF5PepwD0xMGkV47iINBGvyHyU8/mtsOqjOgjadiC+kCzg78wM97w3USinOwRy9PoTf1BpPxa2yFHko18u65HIEd2O8rb96pLI2wmUNii4vs0c9SpVRTDd4BCNKbpSjNTRzZs1xrtW26ZfvXslWH9GzNOddo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Tm/UzEio; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Tm/UzEio" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1769810227; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iSoEaRWTcTvxMBESK8unAv3qC2lHv1zUGYHPHFjrwyI=; b=Tm/UzEioEPJB+upElpKjdw3Y9zNGvcUe5ACe6pAfbZ6qkzksi3F3Gu4pLQuBwprCSY0xI4 xTfDTW3AFtH9tGyUpIaD7sP0q5PKH4kIwqtKg7qvXsP9vytWDVWLd04ZGkc0VsChy2ye0i kUsH1XTesoNKFqO+J5edKvdJCbBCfIc= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-643-GTgToD_qPrGk6-0wvTNeaw-1; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 16:57:04 -0500 X-MC-Unique: GTgToD_qPrGk6-0wvTNeaw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: GTgToD_qPrGk6-0wvTNeaw_1769810223 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B26B195605B; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 21:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.44.33.164]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8911956056; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 21:57:00 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <2274419.1769795849@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Sami Tolvanen Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Mark Brown , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Petr Pavlu Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the keys-next tree with the modules tree Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2281243.1769810219.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 21:56:59 +0000 Message-ID: <2281244.1769810219@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > Wouldn't that mean having to rebase before sending to Linus? > > Do you plan to send these to Linus for 7.0-rc1? Yes, hopefully. > The patches already depend on libcrypto-next landing first, right? Yes - if that was the only thing, I'd just ask Linus to pull them after that. > If the patches were last rebased 6h ago, I'm not sure if rebasing them on > top of modules-next would significantly affect the linux-next soak time, but > I'm fine either way. Rebasing on modules-next wouldn't work unless modules-next has Eric's branch merged in for the ML-DSA bits. I could maybe merge the two and rebase on that, but I think Linus isn't keen on that. David