From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D933C43381 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FA220830 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731187AbfCYMZ0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 08:25:26 -0400 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]:52212 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730996AbfCYMZZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 08:25:25 -0400 Received: from [94.134.91.136] (helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h8OfJ-0006lc-8k; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:25:21 +0100 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Douglas Anderson Cc: mka@chromium.org, ryandcase@chromium.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Tomeu Vizoso , Alexis Ballier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Robin Murphy , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Akash Gajjar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: dts: rockchip: Add rk3288-veyron-jerry rev 10-15 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:25:20 +0100 Message-ID: <22847786.E0k6fS2MZ4@phil> In-Reply-To: <20190322195924.70448-1-dianders@chromium.org> References: <20190322195924.70448-1-dianders@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 22. März 2019, 20:59:23 CET schrieb Douglas Anderson: > As far as I can tell/remember rev10 was originally created to support > making a SKU of jerry that had a different LCD. rev11-rev15 were > added to give some wiggle room for future builds. Downstream has a > separate device tree for rev10-rev15 (compared to rev3-rev7) with the > expectation that differences relating to the LCD would be accounted > for there but nothing was ever added to the rev10-rev15 making it > identical to the rev3-rev7 one. > > It's likely nothing actually shipped with rev10-rev15 but they are > listed in the downstream kernel's device tree and it seems like it > should add a little safety if we match them here just in case > something actually shipped with one of these revisions and that device > will break if we don't claim support. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson applied both for 5.2 Thanks Heiko