From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 1.1 is available.
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 02:03:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2286.997545780@ocs3.ocs-net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 11 Aug 2001 16:20:28 +0100." <20010811162028.A2732@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, 11 Aug 2001 16:20:28 +0100,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 01:03:00AM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
>> * Create arch/$(ARCH)/offsets.c containing code like this, from
>> arch/i386/offsets.c. This should be the standard format on all
>> architectures, the only difference should be the list of fields to
>> generate.
>
>I'm sorry, the ARM version of GCC does not support %c0 in a working
>state. The way we generate the offsets on ARM is here to stay for
>the next few years until GCC 3 has stabilised well enough for use
>with the kernel, and the ARM architecture specifically.
>
>Please don't rely on %c0 working.
If you have to use %0 instead of %c0, that is all right. Just remove
the extra '$' in the Makefile as arch/arm/tools/Makefile already does.
I would still like to see arm in 2.5 using the same style as i386,
including printing the offset in decimal and hex together with the
comment. But that is just style, the important thing is to generate
assembler offsets so that kbuild can correctly track the dependencies.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-11 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-11 15:03 Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 1.1 is available Keith Owens
2001-08-11 15:20 ` Russell King
2001-08-11 16:03 ` Keith Owens [this message]
2001-08-11 16:08 ` Philip Blundell
2001-08-11 16:14 ` Russell King
2001-08-11 21:35 ` [kbuild-devel] " Tom Rini
2001-08-11 21:55 ` Roman Zippel
2001-08-12 1:17 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-11 22:02 ` [kbuild-devel] " Tom Rini
2001-08-12 1:21 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-12 1:44 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-12 14:36 ` David Woodhouse
2001-08-12 14:48 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-12 14:56 ` David Woodhouse
2001-08-12 14:56 ` Russell King
2001-08-13 2:23 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-12 2:24 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-12 4:30 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-19 7:13 ` Richard Henderson
[not found] <20010811212051.A819@jaquet.dk>
2001-08-12 2:11 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-12 2:27 ` Tom Rini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-12 7:31 [kbuild-devel] " Rasmus Andersen
2001-08-12 7:44 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-12 7:57 ` Daniel T. Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2286.997545780@ocs3.ocs-net \
--to=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox