From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: "HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@hp.com>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:24:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22920000.997799084@tiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F341E03C8ED6D311805E00902761278C04728E71@xfc04.fc.hp.com>
On Monday, August 13, 2001 09:40:59 AM -0700 "HABBINGA,ERIK
(HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@hp.com> wrote:
> Here are some SPEC SFS NFS testing (http://www.spec.org/osg/sfs97) results
> I've been doing over the past few weeks that shows NFS performance
> degrading since the 2.4.5pre1 kernel. I've kept the hardware constant,
> only changing the kernel.
Did the 2.4.5pre1 have the transaction tracking patch?
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-14 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-13 16:40 Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this) HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
2001-08-13 21:12 ` Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results show this) Hans Reiser
2001-08-14 7:57 ` Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-08-14 14:24 ` Chris Mason [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-14 15:04 Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this) HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
2001-08-15 16:42 HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
2001-08-15 21:14 HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
2001-08-17 16:14 HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
2001-08-31 15:47 HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22920000.997799084@tiny \
--to=mason@suse.com \
--cc=erik_habbinga@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox