From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758875Ab0EEKDt (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2010 06:03:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27997 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751342Ab0EEKDs (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2010 06:03:48 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20100505032033.GA19232@google.com> References: <20100505032033.GA19232@google.com> To: Michel Lespinasse Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andrew Morton , Linux-MM , Ying Han , LKML Subject: Re: rwsem: down_read_unfair() proposal Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 11:03:40 +0100 Message-ID: <22933.1273053820@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If the system is as heavily loaded as you say, how do you prevent writer starvation? Or do things just grind along until sufficient threads are queued waiting for a write lock? David