From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752273AbbLLN3T (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 12 Dec 2015 08:29:19 -0500
Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:52508 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750849AbbLLN3S convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 12 Dec 2015 08:29:18 -0500
From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>, Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
        linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Improve drm_of_component_probe() and move rockchip to use it
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 14:29:02 +0100
Message-ID: <2302646.WIa4ZQmOnV@diego>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.2.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.14.13; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1448029325-14602-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
References: <1448029325-14602-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Dave,

Am Freitag, 20. November 2015, 14:22:03 schrieb Liviu Dudau:
> This is v2 of the patchset trying to make drm_of_component_probe() cope with
> finding both local crtc ports and remote encoder ones. Heiko Stübner was
> nice enough to test an earlier version that was patched following Russell's
> suggestions on rk3288, but I haven't seen any reports from iMX or Armada
> users.

these 2 patches seem to work nicely now and can probably get applied. Do you 
want to pick them up, or do you expect Mark to do this and then include them 
in a pull request?


Thanks
Heiko