From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"tomas.winkler@intel.com" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@samsung.com>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@samsung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
Adel Choi <adel.choi@samsung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB module
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:30:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <231786897.01592395081831.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR04MB46405EC52240E00F5D634E2AFC9A0@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
>
> > This is a patch for the HPB module.
> > The HPB module queries UFS for device information during initialization.
> > We added the export symbol to two functions in ufshcd.c to initialize
> > the HPB module.
> >
> > The HPB module can be loaded or built-in as needed.
> > The mininum size of the memory pool used in the HPB module is
> Typo minimum
>
> > implemented
> > as a module parameter, so that it can be configurable by the user.
> >
> > To gurantee a minimum memory pool size of 4MB:
> > $ insmod ufshpb.ko ufshpb_host_map_kbytes=4096
> You are going through a lot of troubles to make it a loadable module.
> What are, in your opinion, the pros and cons of this design decision?
In my opinion...
pros:
1. A user can unload an unnecessary module when there is an insufficient
memory situation (HPB case).
2. Since each UFS vendor has a different way of implementing UFS features,
it can be supported as a separate module. Otherwise, many quirks must
be attached to module, which is not desirable way.
3. It is possible to distinguish parts that are not necessary for essential
ufs operation.
4. It is advantageous to implement the latest functions according to the
development speed of UFS.
cons:
1. It is difficult work to be implemented as a module.
2. Modifying "ufsfeature.c" is required to implement the feature that can
not supported by the exsiting "ufsf_operation".
Thanks,
Daejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-17 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200615062708epcms2p19a7fbc051bcd5e843c29dcd58fff4210@epcms2p1>
2020-06-15 6:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Daejun Park
2020-06-15 7:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS feature related parameter Daejun Park
2020-06-15 7:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS-feature layer Daejun Park
2020-06-15 9:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB module Daejun Park
2020-06-15 9:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-06-15 9:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region Daejun Park
2020-06-15 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Bean Huo
2020-06-16 1:17 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-17 11:44 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-18 1:03 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-18 6:12 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-19 0:16 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-18 10:22 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-19 0:12 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-17 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB module Avri Altman
2020-06-17 10:30 ` Daejun Park [this message]
2020-06-17 18:24 ` Bean Huo
2020-06-18 1:06 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-18 6:19 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-17 11:31 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-18 0:53 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-15 13:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS-feature layer Bean Huo
2020-06-16 1:18 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-17 6:55 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-17 8:57 ` Alim Akhtar
2020-06-17 9:41 ` Bean Huo
2020-06-17 9:53 ` Alim Akhtar
2020-06-17 7:08 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-17 10:09 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-22 4:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=231786897.01592395081831.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2 \
--to=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
--cc=adel.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=boram.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=j-young.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sangyoon.oh@samsung.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=sungjun07.park@samsung.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox