public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	npiggin@suse.de, gerg@snapgear.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] NOMMU: Make the initial mmap allocation excess behaviour Kconfig configurable
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 12:42:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23252.1241610161@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090505151520.070c84c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Nasty problem.

Yes.  That's part of the fun of the NOMMU world.  It has many of the same
problems as the MMU world - just more exaggerated.

> > -int sysctl_nr_trim_pages = 1; /* page trimming behaviour */
> > +int sysctl_nr_trim_pages = CONFIG_NOMMU_INITIAL_TRIM_EXCESS;
> >  int heap_stack_gap = 0;
> >  
> 
> But there's a risk of -ENOMEM regression on other system here?

There shouldn't be (assuming you mean with this patch), the default is the
same as the original value.

> It's unlikely to be a huge problem for real-world embedded developers,
> as long as they know about this change.  And because you set the
> Kconfig default to "no change" then I guess they'll be none the wiser.
> 
> I think that patches 2 and 3 (and #1 unless I reorder and redo things)
> are 2.6.30 material.  Agree?

Assuming you mean go in before 2.6.30 is cut, then yes.  If you want, I can
reorder the patches to put #1 last.

David

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-06 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-05 21:26 [PATCH 1/3] Use roundown_pow_of_two() in zone_batchsize() David Howells
2009-05-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] NOMMU: Clamp zone_batchsize() to 0 under NOMMU conditions David Howells
2009-05-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] NOMMU: Make the initial mmap allocation excess behaviour Kconfig configurable David Howells
2009-05-05 22:15   ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-06  0:09     ` Greg Ungerer
2009-05-06 11:42     ` David Howells [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23252.1241610161@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox