The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/11] bpftool: Generate skeleton for global percpu data
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:15:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2330e6a8-c7eb-4296-8aa0-feaafd6b09cf@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4Bzay2Wssj1J4fEq3T7iTOBDswEZunm1OQNDJvPr2Cz2Usg@mail.gmail.com>

On 24/6/26 06:46, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 7:37 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
[...]
>> @@ -263,13 +268,12 @@ static bool is_mmapable_map(const struct bpf_map *map, char *buf, size_t sz)
>>                 return true;
>>         }
>>
>> -       if (!bpf_map__is_internal(map) || !(bpf_map__map_flags(map) & BPF_F_MMAPABLE))
>> -               return false;
>> -
>> -       if (!get_map_ident(map, buf, sz))
>> -               return false;
>> +       if (bpf_map__is_internal(map) &&
>> +           ((bpf_map__map_flags(map) & BPF_F_MMAPABLE) || bpf_map_is_percpu_data(map)) &&
>> +           get_map_ident(map, buf, sz))
>> +               return true;
>>
> 
> just add `if (bpf_map_is_percpu_data(map) return true;`? maybe also
> move get_map_ident check a bit earlier. I think that will be a bit
> cleaner, this condition is quite hard to follow
> 

Makes sense.

With adding the helper bpf_map_is_skel_data(), will this change looks
more readable?


+static bool bpf_map_is_skel_data(const struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+       return bpf_map__is_internal(map) &&
+               ((bpf_map__map_flags(map) & BPF_F_MMAPABLE) ||
+                bpf_map__type(map) == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
+}
+
 static bool is_mmapable_map(const struct bpf_map *map, char *buf,
size_t sz)
 {
        size_t tmp_sz;
@@ -263,7 +274,7 @@ static bool is_mmapable_map(const struct bpf_map
*map, char *buf, size_t sz)
                return true;
        }

-       if (!bpf_map__is_internal(map) || !(bpf_map__map_flags(map) &
BPF_F_MMAPABLE))
+       if (!bpf_map_is_skel_data(map))
                return false;

        if (!get_map_ident(map, buf, sz))


>> -       return true;
>> +       return false;
>>  }
>>
>>  static int codegen_datasecs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *obj_name)
>> @@ -343,6 +347,9 @@ static int codegen_subskel_datasecs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *obj_name
>>                 if (!is_mmapable_map(map, map_ident, sizeof(map_ident)))
>>                         continue;
>>
>> +               if (bpf_map_is_percpu_data(map))
>> +                       continue;
>> +
>>                 sec = find_type_for_map(btf, map_ident);
>>                 if (!sec)
>>                         continue;
>> @@ -669,7 +676,7 @@ static void codegen_destroy(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *obj_name)
>>                 if (!get_map_ident(map, ident, sizeof(ident)))
>>                         continue;
>>                 if (bpf_map__is_internal(map) &&
>> -                   (bpf_map__map_flags(map) & BPF_F_MMAPABLE))
>> +                   ((bpf_map__map_flags(map) & BPF_F_MMAPABLE) || bpf_map_is_percpu_data(map)))
> 
> also we can add a helper to check if it's an internal map with a
> dedicated data section in the skeleton (too lazy to think of a good
> name right now.. ;)
> 

How about bpf_map_is_skel_data()?

Then, this 'if' will be updated as 'if (bpf_map_is_skel_data(map))'.

Thanks,
Leon

>>                         printf("\tskel_free_map_data(skel->%1$s, skel->maps.%1$s.initial_value, %2$zu);\n",
>>                                ident, bpf_map_mmap_sz(map));
>>                 codegen("\
> 
> [...]


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-24  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-22 14:35 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/11] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/11] bpf: Drop duplicate blank lines in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/11] bpf: Disallow interpreter fallback for user BPF_ADDR_SPACE_CAST insn Leon Hwang
2026-06-23 22:45   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-24  4:10     ` Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/11] bpf: Disallow interpreter fallback for BPF_ADDR_PERCPU insn Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/11] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-23 22:45   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-24  4:11     ` Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/11] libbpf: Probe percpu data feature Leon Hwang
2026-06-23 22:45   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-24  4:11     ` Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/11] libbpf: Add support for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-23 22:45   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-24  4:13     ` Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/11] bpftool: Generate skeleton " Leon Hwang
2026-06-23 22:46   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-24  4:15     ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/11] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify " Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 15:24   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-23  4:02     ` Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/11] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify accessing rdonly percpu_array Leon Hwang
2026-06-23 22:46   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-06-24  4:16     ` Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/11] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify verifier log for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/11] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify bpf_iter " Leon Hwang
2026-06-22 15:24   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-23  4:04     ` Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2330e6a8-c7eb-4296-8aa0-feaafd6b09cf@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox