From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269583AbUHZU26 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:28:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269232AbUHZUMt (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:12:49 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:16274 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269495AbUHZUE4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:04:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:04:17 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Hans Reiser , Andrew Morton cc: hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, torvalds@osdl.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Message-ID: <23320000.1093550657@flay> In-Reply-To: <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> References: <20040824202521.GA26705@lst.de> <412CEE38.1080707@namesys.com> <20040825152805.45a1ce64.akpm@osdl.org> <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Don't move reiser4 into vfs, use reiser4 as the vfs. Ah ... that seems to be a good insight into what you're driving for. That would seem to be good for you ... and bad for other filesystems. So whilst I can see why you'd want it - but I don't think it's a good idea. Competition is good. Andrew wrote: > And what are the licensing implications of plugins? Are they derived > works? Must they be GPL'ed? You replied: >>And what are the licensing implications of plugins? Are they derived >>works? > > Yes. I find it odd that you cut out the last part of his question. So must they be GPL'ed or not? M.