From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933323Ab1JDT3q (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:29:46 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:64922 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932752Ab1JDT3o (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:29:44 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Tony Lindgren , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "Shilimkar, Santosh" , "Cousson, Benoit" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/30] ARM: omap: add board autoselection Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:29:36 +0200 Message-ID: <2340307.S2RzXdHlIz@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.1 (Linux/3.1.0-rc8nosema+; KDE/4.7.1; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20111004155752.GT6324@atomide.com> References: <1317566760-25681-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <201110040944.13205.arnd@arndb.de> <20111004155752.GT6324@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:1nJaxU3iPYit9zyZv8AHLuioqM7O8zG4FcfaNqT8uxI LzjPQLSxrvXCnl7kYLZB+PWnUe35I/QFVnEwTBzxSPb19m5uSw AW2fDP4sl+60uQbdNZViLgua4OntskZsaUz9PoqEu2awxRIzDB Y1bxAAdbnlKNNDVMz1hRTtj9yYuJswCClPXpPC28aQXiYXLkvK niDzdlCaeR2ig5nLXHLGtULjUXDLcbY12yt3n/bcZyHVbbXhv7 7ll+WsXVE+Tfg+wBQyvggMdv2YdopQoeUGRlDPzXovjLYENmGf V7VuBoLxAqlbVCfD75abTHO+aUuVD9qrWGE1usuFvwZqIwOXQP onL48+0AeHEht8zCoY3Y= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 04 October 2011 08:57:52 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Arnd Bergmann [111004 00:10]: > > On Monday 03 October 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > Yes please leave out the list so we don't need to constantly update it. > > > Let's just always build in MACH_OMAP_GENERIC. > > > > That's what I had initially, but now that board file has become > > omap2-specific and no longer works on omap3-only or omap4-only > > configurations. > > Will send a pull request for basic DT bootstrap support from Benoit > that fixes that. So maybe let's sort that out first, then always > select it? Yes, sounds good. That is certainly the better solution in the long run. Arnd