From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: y2038@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Ed Cashin <ed.cashin@acm.org>,
Tina Ruchandani <ruchandani.tina@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Y2038] [PATCH] aoe: Use 64-bit timestamp in frame
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:14:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2349651.fBUtehr528@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2498255.lB0xaQWuiu@wuerfel>
On Tuesday 12 May 2015 11:44:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> There are of course multiple ways to do this. One way would be to
> change the code to work on 32-bit nanoseconds instead of 32-bit
> microseconds. This requires proving that the we cannot exceed
> 4.29 seconds of round-trip time in calc_rttavg().
> Is that a valid assumption or not?
>
> If not, we could replace do_gettimeofday() with ktime_get_ts64().
> This will ensure we don't need a 64-bit division when converting
> the ts64 to a 32-bit microsecond value, and combined with the
> conversion is still no slower than do_gettimeofday(), and it
> still avoids the double bookkeeping because it uses a monotonic
> timebase that is robust against settimeofday.
Two other approaches that occurred to me later:
- introduce common ktime_get_ms(), ktime_get_us(), ktime_get_real_ms()
and ktime_get_real_is() interfaces, to match the other interfaces
we already provide. These could be done as efficiently or better
than what aoe does manually today.
- change the timebase that is used for the computations in aoe to use
scaled nanoseconds instead of microseconds. Using
u32 time = ktime_get_ns() >> 10;
would give you a similar range and precision as microseconds, but
completely avoid integer division. You could also use a different
shift value to either extend the range beyond 71 minutes, or the
extend the precision to something below a microsecond. This would
be the most efficient implementation, but also require significant
changes to the driver.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-12 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-11 2:35 [PATCH] aoe: Use 64-bit timestamp in frame Tina Ruchandani
2015-05-11 15:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-11 15:59 ` Ed Cashin
2015-05-12 1:00 ` Ed Cashin
2015-05-12 9:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-12 11:14 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-05-13 1:23 ` [Y2038] " Ed Cashin
2015-05-13 8:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-14 0:47 ` Ed Cashin
2015-05-12 11:21 ` Ed Cashin
2015-05-13 1:26 ` Ed Cashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2349651.fBUtehr528@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ed.cashin@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ruchandani.tina@gmail.com \
--cc=y2038@lists.linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox