From: "Stephan Müller" <smueller@chronox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] crypto: DRBG - prepare for more fine-grained tracking of seeding state
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:37:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2351272.LuTyyo00Js@positron.chronox.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211025092525.12805-2-nstange@suse.de>
Am Montag, 25. Oktober 2021, 11:25:20 CEST schrieb Nicolai Stange:
Hi Nicolai,
> There are two different randomness sources the DRBGs are getting seeded
> from, namely the jitterentropy source (if enabled) and get_random_bytes().
> At initial DRBG seeding time during boot, the latter might not have
> collected sufficient entropy for seeding itself yet and thus, the DRBG
> implementation schedules a reseed work from a random_ready_callback once
> that has happened. This is particularly important for the !->pr DRBG
> instances, for which (almost) no further reseeds are getting triggered
> during their lifetime.
>
> Because collecting data from the jitterentropy source is a rather expensive
> operation, the aforementioned asynchronously scheduled reseed work
> restricts itself to get_random_bytes() only. That is, it in some sense
> amends the initial DRBG seed derived from jitterentropy output at full
> (estimated) entropy with fresh randomness obtained from get_random_bytes()
> once that has been seeded with sufficient entropy itself.
>
> With the advent of rng_is_initialized(), there is no real need for doing
> the reseed operation from an asynchronously scheduled work anymore and a
> subsequent patch will make it synchronous by moving it next to related
> logic already present in drbg_generate().
>
> However, for tracking whether a full reseed including the jitterentropy
> source is required or a "partial" reseed involving only get_random_bytes()
> would be sufficient already, the boolean struct drbg_state's ->seeded
> member must become a tristate value.
>
> Prepare for this by introducing the new enum drbg_seed_state and change
> struct drbg_state's ->seeded member's type from bool to that type.
>
> For facilitating review, enum drbg_seed_state is made to only contain
> two members corresponding to the former ->seeded values of false and true
> resp. at this point: DRBG_SEED_STATE_UNSEEDED and DRBG_SEED_STATE_FULL. A
> third one for tracking the intermediate state of "seeded from jitterentropy
> only" will be introduced with a subsequent patch.
>
> There is no change in behaviour at this point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Müller <smueller@chronox.de>
Ciao
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-26 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-25 9:25 [PATCH 0/6] crypto: DRBG - improve 'nopr' reseeding Nicolai Stange
2021-10-25 9:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] crypto: DRBG - prepare for more fine-grained tracking of seeding state Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26 8:37 ` Stephan Müller [this message]
2021-10-25 9:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] crypto: DRBG - track whether DRBG was seeded with !rng_is_initialized() Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26 8:41 ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-25 9:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] crypto: DRBG - move dynamic ->reseed_threshold adjustments to __drbg_seed() Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26 9:05 ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-25 9:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] crypto: DRBG - make reseeding from get_random_bytes() synchronous Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26 9:19 ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-27 9:19 ` Nicolai Stange
2021-10-27 18:44 ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-25 9:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] crypto: DRBG - make drbg_prepare_hrng() handle jent instantiation errors Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26 9:19 ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-25 9:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] crypto: DRBG - reseed 'nopr' drbgs periodically from get_random_bytes() Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26 9:33 ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-26 8:33 ` [PATCH 0/6] crypto: DRBG - improve 'nopr' reseeding Stephan Müller
2021-10-27 8:40 ` Nicolai Stange
2021-10-27 18:43 ` Stephan Müller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2351272.LuTyyo00Js@positron.chronox.de \
--to=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=duwe@suse.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nstange@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox